Get Adobe Flash player

CHEMICAL WEAPONS

WE DIDN’T START THE FIRE, BUT THE U.S. USED CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN NAM: Update for Coming Obamanation

THE SHAMEFUL (AND RECENT) HISTORY OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS ABUSES BY THE US GOVERNMENT forward from scriptonitedaily.wordpress.com, courtesy of Netra Halpern

Nam
During this unsettling march to war with Syria, political leaders in the US have repeatedly stated that Syria has broken an agreement, put in place at the end of World War I, that chemical weapons are not to be used in warfare. Some may be left believing that chemical weapons have been absent from the theatre of war between then and the Syrian attacks on August 21st 2013. This is not the case. In fact, the US is the biggest abuser of chemical weapons on earth, deploying these weapons across the world right to the present day.

The Chemical Weapons Timeline to World War II

Chemical and biological weapons have been with us since the Spartan Greek’s used sulphur fumes on enemy soldiers in the 400′s BC. They became the tool of imperialism and colonialism from the 17th century and beyond.

In the 18th Century, colonialists seeking to overcome the Native American population distributed small pox infected blankets as ‘gifts’ of peace to native American communities. In 1770, almost 30% of the population was wiped out by small pox infection. In the 80 years of European immigration to the North American continent, the Native American population reduced from 37,000 to 9,000 – largely due to the various diseases and epidemics perpetrated against them. You can read a fuller account of the devastation of indigenous communities here.

At World War I (1914-18), the German army reintroduced chemical weapons, using chlorine gas at the second battle of Ypres. By the end of the war, with all sides deploying mustard and chlorine gas, 85,000 had been killed and 1.2m injured by these toxic weapons.

Between the end of World War I and the outbreak of World War II in 1939, the world went on a bit of a chemical weapons binge. The Russian forces used poison gas against the Bolsheviks (with UK support), Spain and France used mustard gas in Morocco, and Britain tested mustard gas by releasing it against Iraqi populations. Winston Churchill stated that “I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes”.

Despite a brief stand off during the first year of World War II thanks to fears of reprisals from all sides, chemical weapons were again deployed in 1942. The Nazi government used Zyklon-B to gas ‘undesirable’ groups such as Jews, disabled people, mentally ill people and dissenters of the regime. By the end of the holocaust, 5.8 million Jews and 5 million other ‘undesirables’ had been killed, including 1.5 million children.

The US Becomes the World’s Worst Chemical Weapons Offender Post World War II

Since the Second World War, the US has led the world in the development, production and deployment of chemical weapons on both military and civilian populations at home and across the world.

At Home

According to the San Francisco Chronicle:

“In 1950, the Army secretly used a Navy ship cruising just outside the Golden Gate to spray supposedly harmless bacteria over the entire city and its outskirts. Eleven people were sickened by the germs in San Francisco, and one of them died.

From 1956 to 1961, the CIA, in a secret behavior modification program called MK-ULTRA, dispatched agents to test the effects of mind-altering drugs such as LSD and synthetic mescaline on unsuspecting people in San Francisco, Mill Valley and other cities across the country. Many of the victims hallucinated, many became sick and at least two deaths resulted from the experiments.

From 1944 to 1974, both the Defense Department and the Atomic Energy Commission conducted hundreds of secret experiments in San Francisco and around the country that exposed unsuspecting patients to dangerous doses of radiation, including injections of plutonium.”

It didn’t stop there. Global Research reports:

“1951: Racist experiments are carried out. U.S. Army researchers deliberately expose African-Americans to the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus to discern whether they are more susceptible to infections caused by such organisms than white Europeans. Also in 1951, black workers at the Norfolk Supply Center in Virginia were exposed to crates contaminated with A. fumigatus spores.”

This list is by no means exhaustive, and you can see the full history of domestic use of chemical agents as weapons on domestic US populations here.

Across the World

The Korean War – 1950-53

During the war, North Korea and China accused the US of using the germ warfare agents they had developed in 1947.

The Vietnam War 1955-1975

The US used Napalm and Agent Orange as their premier chemical weapons between 1965 and 1972. Napalm is “a mixture of plastic polystyrene, hydrocarbon benzene, and gasoline. This mixture creates a jelly-like substance that, when ignited, sticks to practically anything and burns up to ten minutes.” Kim Phuc, a survivor of Napalm attacks in Vietnam says “Napalm is the most terrible pain you can ever imagine. Water boils at 212°F. Napalm generates temperatures 1,500°F to 2,200°F.”

You will likely remember Kim as a 9 year old naked child fleeing this Napalm attack, her photo becoming one of the defining images of the war.

The US dropped more than 400,000 tons of Napalm on largely civilian areas of Vietnam through the war.

Agent Orange is a toxic chemical herbicide fifty times more concentrated than regular herbicides. It was used by the US to devastate crops and water sources, in efforts to drive out Vietnamese into US controlled areas. The US sprayed 73 million litres of Agents Orange, Blue, Pink, Purple and Green onto Vietnam between 1962 and 1970. According to a War Legacies research paper:

“The herbicides were sprayed over about 24 percent of southern Vietnam, destroying 5 million acres of upland and mangrove forests and about 500,000 acres of crops (a total area the size of Massachusetts). Of these areas, 34 percent were sprayed more than once; some of the upland forests were sprayed more than four times.vi One study found that 3,181 villages were sprayed as well. Areas of Laos and Cambodia near the Vietnam border were also sprayed.”

The Vietnam Red Cross recorded over 4.8 million deaths and 400,000 birth defects caused by the use of Agent Orange.

The US has been directly and indirectly responsible for the use of chemical weapons in Iraq over generations. We have already covered the testing of weapons on Iraqi populations. When people claim Saddam used chemical weapons on his own people, they refer to the chemical gas attack on Halabja in 1988, which killed at least 5,000 Kurdish civilians. This attack was carried out in the dying months of the Iran-Iraq war, while the UK’s Thatcher government were providing military support to his regime. The Reagan White House continued to maintain Agricultural Credits with Iraq, and blocked congressional sanctions against Iraq.

In the most recent attack on Iraq, the US used White Phosphorous, Napalm and Depleted Uranium in contravention of all conventions. According to a recent study by the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Fallujah now has a higher rate of cancer, leukaemia and infant mortality than Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Describing the effects on the ground, this report:

‘Young women in Fallujah are terrified of having children because of the increasing number of babies born grotesquely deformed, with no heads, two heads, a single eye in their foreheads, scaly bodies or missing limbs. In addition, young children in Fallujah are now experiencing hideous cancers and leukaemias.’ Researchers found a 38-fold increase in leukaemia, a ten-fold increase in female breast cancer and significant increases in lymphoma and brain tumours in adults.

White phosphorus burns at extremely high temperatures and ignites clothing, fuel, ammunition and other combustibles. If it lands on a person, it can burn through skin and bone. The US used this on Iraq in 2004. The number of deaths and injuries is not known.

The above list is not even a full history, but some of the most notable uses. The US has consistently flouted international conventions on the use of chemical weapons. Whether we are evaluating by death toll, legacy such as birth defects and crises of public health, or environmental impacts: the US it is the worst abuser of chemical weapons on the planet.

Convention? What Convention?

The US has actively dodged conventions on the use of chemical weapons, and when it has seen fit to bother signing them, it has simply ignored them.

In 1907, the Hague Convention outlawed chemical weapons, but the US did not join the convention.

In 1928 (first signed 1925), the League of Nations (early attempt at a UN) produced the Geneva Protocol to prohibit gas and biological warfare; the US refused to join the League of Nations.

In 1947, President Harry Truman withdrew the Geneva Protocol from consideration by Congress.

In 1961, President Kennedy increased spending on chemical weapon development from $75m to $330m.

It was not until 1974 that the US ratified the 1928 Geneva Protocols, having spent the preceding years devastating Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia with Napalm and Agent Orange. Yet, by 1985 the US has resumed open air testing of biological agents and supplied these agents to Iraq for the following four years, during the period in which the Halabja massacre occurred.

In 1989, 140 nations condemned the use of chemical weapons at the Paris Conference, initiated by the US after the Iraqi gas attacks which they were in part responsible for; it was later revealed that the US was producing poison gas even as it signed the treaty.

The latest Chemical Weapons Convention was signed by the US in April 1997 and came into force the same day, and we have seen the level of chemical warfare they have engaged in since that date.

Hypocrisy

The reality is, if we want to take action against the most dangerous violator of chemical weapons in our world – we need to take on the United States. This in no way excuses the use of chemical weapons by any other state or group. But a US government that has devastated regions of Iraq with napalm, white phosphorus and depleted uranium must not be allowed to grandstand on the world stage without mention of these outrageous war crimes. If we are to be serious about such international conventions, they must apply to all nations.

“IF OBAMA ORDERS SYRIA BOMBED HE CAN BE IMPEACHED” Internet Radio + Incisive Articles

Syria3Alfred Lambremont Webre

 

ALFRED WEBRE, Judge of the International Court of War Crimes and Candidate for UN Secretary General, interviewed by hosts Dr. Sasha and Janet Kira Lessin, says If Obama orders syria bombed he can be impeached.

 

Of course, says Dr. Lessin,  if Syria disarms verifiably, Americans can sing Kumbaya.

But Congress withholds okay, Obama, a CIA Illuminati frontman, can be impeached by U.S. law; if Congress gives bombing the go, Obama can be impeached for violating International Law, perpetrating an attack on a distant country that is not threatening the US.
Obama illuminati

But, Webre, opines, Obama may be deliberately thwarting the Power Elite’s agenda for World War III, saying Congress forces him to stand down from the attack, so the Elite needn’t kill him and his family.

WEBRE ON THE SYRIA CRISIS

Alfred says, “I am seeking the office of Secretary General of the United Nations for the terms starting January 1, 2017 and/or January 1, 2021 to help co-create a positive future for humanity and Earth, my name to be put forth by citizens of the world.

Click the arrow and what you hear’ll blow your mind.

 

Alfred Webre is running, with full endorsement from the World Peace Association, for Secretary General of the United Nations.

Below’s more quotes from Alfred:

In 2011, Ban Ki Moon ran unopposed for a second term as Secretary-General of the United Nations. On 21 June 2011, he was unanimously re-elected by the General Assembly and therefore will continue to serve until 31 December 2016.

Under Chapter XV, Article 97 of the United Nations Charter, “The Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.”

This is to interject a reality check of what I am trying to do in my “campaign” to be UN Secretary General (UNSG), either for the term beginning Jan. 1, 2017 or Jan. 1, 2021.

First of all, the nomination of a UNSG requires (1) the approval of the UN Security Council (where USA, Russia, China, UK and France can veto); and (2) the majority vote of the UN General Assembly.

So under present conditions to think that I would be nominated UNSG is absurd.

I am undertaking this initiative for multi-level reasons, one of which is as a public platform to showcase the policies that humanity could have at a planetary level.

Below are some of key policies I will espouse for a future sustainable, free, and thriving multi-dimensional world.

Will you support me in this effort and help me work toward these goals?

My Key Policies for a Positive Future

Here are some key elements of the policies I will work to implement dynamically and simultaneously in parallel as UN Secretary General.

1.      Extraterrestrial disclosure – A full public disclosure of the presence of intelligent civilizations in Earth’s environment and a global referendum as to whether and on what conditions humanity should enter into relations with organized multiverse society, including a world-sponsored Mars Protection Treaty.

2.      Criminalization of the war industry – A criminalization of and global ban on war and armed conflict as a dispute resolution method. A permanent ban on the design, production, or sale of weapons systems, including nuclear weapons, space-based weapons, and conventional weapons. A permanent ban on the maintenance of offensive armed forces.  Imposition of heavy criminal penalties for violation and astronomical fines, for individuals, organizations, and nations.

3.      Criminal Prosecution and Conviction of War Crimes Racketeering Organization and Restorative Justice for War Crimes Victims – Criminalization and rigorous prosecution of the international war crimes racketeering organization for a planning and implementing a genocidal depopulation program, including:  (a) planning and triggering wars and armed conflicts through false flag operations; (b) regional and global radiation genocide and ecocide through depleted uranium (DU) and the nuclear agenda; (c) planning and implementing environmental war attacks including geo-engineering, weather warfare, HAARP, chemtrails, and scalar weapons robotization and genocide of humanity, famine, GMO foods, DNA manipulation and more; (d) Carrying out a program of assassination and Cointelpro terror against activists, researchers and social inventors in the multiple areas of peace research; new energy; food and nutrition; radiation; democracy and electoral politics; (e) Carrying out as DOPE INC. a lethal, 300 hundred year old conspiracy to addict humanity to narcotics and to criminalize useful substances such as hemp for profit and enslavement. There is no statute of limitations on murder. Imposition of heavy criminal penalties for violation and astronomical fines, for individuals, organizations, and nations.

4.      Global Teleportation – Implementation of quantum access teleportation as a global, regional and local transportation system replacing polluting fossil fuel vehicles (trains, buses, trucks, autos) and their intensive land use in highways, railways, and urban freeways, as well as of a regulated time travel public education program.  New free energy technology – Public implementation and roll-out of sequestered of free energy technologies for powering dwellings, human settlements, industry, transport and propulsion, communication and many other areas

5.     Animal Personhood – Worldwide grant of personhood rights to animals with concommitant rights against murder, slaughter, torture, and cruel and inhumane treatment.  Special intelligent civilization status for cetaceans including whales and dolphins. Development of healthy, safe, tasty protein meat substitutes for humanity’s consumption and nutrition.

6.    World Debt Forgiveness – Global forgiveness of all public and private debts – a world bankruptcy for a bankrupt system and an end to the debt – fiat money prison system.  Criminalization of charging interest on money and of fractional reserve lending.  The institution of a modified world sharia banking system.

7.      Reinvention of Money: Money as a human right – (1) A global ban on privately controlled central banks like the “U.S. Federal Reserve System” and a permanent ban on privately-owned commercial banks; (2) Licensing of consumer cooperatively owned banks; (3) Money as a public utility like air, water or electricity available for creative investment at public money utilities. Imposition of heavy criminal penalties for violation and astronomical fines, for individuals, organizations, and nations.

8.      Social Guarantees – Guaranteed annual income, health care, and elementary, secondary, and post-secondary education for every person on the planet, for life from birth to death, funded by universal state pools, tax on all financial transactions and by post graduation contributions to education plan, and more.  Implementation of traditional and alternative, as well as advanced extraterrestrial medical technologies.

9.      Virtual Direct Democracy – Secure virtual technology now permits the implementation of Swiss canton democracy worldwide.  There is no more need for intermediaries such as City Councils, State or Provincial Legislatures, National Parliaments or Congresses, or even, ultimately in time, a gathering of nations such as the United Nations. Experience over the centuries has shown that the powers that be buy off all intermediaries.  Direct virtual democracy adapts secure virtual technologies and provides virtual hack-proof citizen voting at the municipal, provincial/state, regional, national, and world level.   Under direct virtual democracy, the entire city votes on municipal laws; the entire nation votes on national laws; the world population votes on global standards, all duly informed by government staff at the respective local, national and world level. Municipal Government, for example, is tasked with efficiently picking up the garbage and managing the city according to the laws passed by local virtual democracy.

10.    Disestablishment of monarchies and religions worldwide – The UK monarchy and the Vatican are examples of the abuses that occur when two institutions based on non-democratic principles (Divine Right of Kings and Popes) are given established state rights in a modern democratic world.

11.    More – Please feel free to suggest more key policies.

How Intelligence Legend & Manchurian candidate Barack Hussein Obama was created By Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd

VIEW SLIDE PRESENTATION ONLINE

http://www.slideshare.net/exouniversity/manchurian-candidate-barack-hussein-obama

OBAMA SWEDEN ~ http://www.whitetv.se/en/911/667.html

In Light and Cosmic Love,

Alfred 😉

Contact: Exopolitics@exopolitics.com

Facebook group:https://www.facebook.com/groups/alfred.lambremont.webre/

Website: www.exopolitics.com

http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics/2013/09/i-am-seeking-the-office-of-secretary-general-of-the-united-nations-for-the-terms-starting-january-1-2016-andor-january-1-2.html

 

Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd is a futurist and author ofExopolitics: Politics, Government and Law in the Universe(available at www.UniverseBooks.com), a book that founded the field of Exopolitics – the science of relations among intelligent civilizations in the multi-verse.  Exopolitics includes a case study of human contact with an advanced civilization on Mars.

Alfred’s forthcoming book, The Dimensional Ecology of the Multi-verse, integrates empirical data from intelligent extraterrestrial civilizations and intelligent civilizations of souls in the Inter-life and demonstrates a new hypothesis of a functioning ecology of intelligence in the dimensions in the multi-verse.

Alfred is a journalist, whose Exopolitics.com articles on multiversal research and cooperation are widely read in North America. Webre is the founder of www.exopolitics.com, a leading exopolitical news website, and the host of ExopoliticsTV, a public affairs channel on relations among intelligent civilizations in the multi-verse.

Alfred’s investigative journalism has been featured on TruTV, PressTV, and mainstream TV networks, and has exposed an international war crimes racketeering organization using exotic technologies such as the HAARP aerosol/chemtrails weapons system for tectonic and weather warfare, mind control and other ecocidal and depopulation programs.  Please visitwww.exopolitics.com.

Alfred is chairman of the Mars Anomaly Research Society (MARS)www.projectmars.net, which is spearheading the international effort to research, disclose, and educate the public about life on Mars.  He has proposed a truth- amnesty process to facilitate the release of the advanced, extraterrestrial-derived new energy technologies that can be used to create a sustainable, peaceful space age society.

Alfred is a graduate of Yale University and Yale Law School in international law and was a Fulbright Scholar in international economic integration in Uruguay.  He has taught economics at Yale University and constitutional law at the University of Texas.  Alfred was general counsel to the New York City Environmental Protection Administration, a futurist at Stanford Research Institute (where he directed the proposed 1977 Carter White House extraterrestrial communication study), was a NGO delegate to the United Nations and the UNISPACE conference, and is a judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal.

Alfred is currently developing ExoUniversity, an educational entity (www.exouniversity.org) whose goal is to provide web-based interactive continuing education, research, information, and policy regarding Exopolitics, PsiSciences and ExoSciences to individuals and institutions throughout the world.

Website:
Exopolitics.com: http://www.exopolitics.com
Contact:
Email: Exopolitics@exopolitics.com
Tel: 604-733-8134
Skype: peaceinspace

 

Alfred Lambremont Webre (born May 24, 1942) is an American author, lawyer, futurist, peace activist, environmental activist, and a space activist who promotes the ban of space weapons. He was a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty and the Space Preservation Act that was introduced to the U.S. Congress by Congressman Dennis Kucinich and is endorsed by more than 270 NGO‘s worldwide.

He was a judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission.

Webre was born May 24, 1942, on a U.S. Naval Air Station. One of his parents is Cuban and Alfred Webre was raised in Cuba.

Biography

Education

Early careerWebre entered Yale University in 1960 and graduated in 1964 with a Bachelor of Science in Industrial Administration Honors. Webre’s interest in law brought him to continue his education and to graduate from Yale Law School, where Webre had national scholarship, with a Juris Doctor in International law in 1967. While studying at Yale Law School, he was also an Assistant in Instruction at the Economics Department of the U.S. Federal Taxation at Yale University (1965–1967). In 1967-1968, Webre traveled to MontevideoUruguay and became a Fulbright Scholar in Economic Integration. In 1993, he entered the University of Texas at Brownsville and graduated with a Master of Education in Counseling in 1997.

Later career: Webre became an associate with Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, in New York City, in 1968. His responsibilities were international finance, tax, and litigation practice for investment banking, corporate, and public sector clients. In 1970, he joined the New York City Environmental Protection Administration as the General Counsel and Assistant Administrator. He designed and enforced environmental standards for air, water, noise pollution, and solid waste management. In 1973, he went to work as a consultant for the Ford Foundation’s Public Interest Environmental Law Program in New York City. He was in charge of evaluation and program recommendations in public interest environmental law program for grantees including Natural Resources Defense Counciland Environmental Defense Fund. In 1977, he joined SRI International in Menlo Park, California, as a futurist for the Center for the Study of Social Policy. His responsibilities were the studies in alternative futures, innovation diffusion, and social policy applications for clients including the Carter White House Extraterrestrial Communications Study, the National Science Foundation, U.S. Congress (Office of Technology Assessment), the U.S. Department of Energy, and the State of California (Energy Plan).

Webre was a member of the Governor’s Emergency Taskforce on Earthquake Preparedness for the state of California between 1980 & 1982.[citation needed] Between 1982-1987, he was a Non Governmental Organization (NGO) Delegate at the United Nations in New York.[citation needed] He was involved with the Communications Coordination Committee for the United Nations, with the UNISPACE Outer Space Conference (Vienna) and involved with the United Nations Second Special Session on Disarmament. In 1983, Webre joined the New York State Legislative Institute as Senior Fellow. He spent time on issues of public policy studies and legislative initiatives for the New York State legislature as well as the development of Graduate School of Political Management. In 1986, he became President of Legal Access Worldwide (L.A.W.) an international legal access and litigation management firm. In 1987, Webre produced and hosted “The Instant of Cooperation”, the first live radio broadcast between USA and the then Soviet Union, carried live by Gosteleradio and NPR satellite on WBAI-FM.

From 2002 to 2011, he was the host of “The Monday Brown Bagger”, a public affairs radio talk show on Coop Radio CFRO 102.7 FM in VancouverBritish Columbia. He is a founding director of Canada’s No Weapons in Space Campaign (NOWIS) established in 2002. In 2004, he created the Campaign for Cooperation in Space (CCIS), an international organization where he works with others to prevent the weaponization of space and promote the transformation of the war economy into a peaceful, cooperative space exploration industry.

Until Nov. 2010, Webre was an international war crimes correspondent for Iran’s Press TV. Alfred’s investigative journalism has been featured on mainstream television networks such as TruTV, and PressTV. In 2011, Webre was interviewed by Gov. Jesse Ventura in a TruTV Conspiracy Theory episode on the BP Gulf Oil Spill.

Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission [edit]

Webre is a judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission, which is an NGO organized in Malaysia to investigate alleged war crimes, particularly in the Middle East. This body holds no official standing nor the ability to enforce its decisions.[citation needed]

Statements on Canada

In an interview with Iran’s Press TV in December 2012, Webre stated that Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is an “out and out Zionist” who is engaging in the “same repressive policies within Canada that Israel follows within its own territories against the Palestinian people.” Webre then described a conspiracy between Vancouver police and serial killer Robert Pickton “to commit ritual Satanic murders with high-ranking politicians.” Finally, Webre claimedt that the Queen of England abducted 10 Aboriginal children in 1964. Concluding his comments, Webre described Canada as “the ultimate Zionist state under the British Crown and under Israel.”

Institute for Cooperation in Space (2001-2011)

Alfred Webre and Dr. Carol Rosin founded the Institute for Cooperation in Space (ICIS) in 2001, as an outgrowth of the former ISCOS, Institute for Cooperation and Security in Space. The ICIS mission is to educate decision-makers and the grassroots about why it is important to ban space weapons. Through the help of former Congressman Dennis Kucinich, the Space Preservation Act was originally introduced into the 107th Congress on October 2, 2001 (HR 2977) and included provisions banning “extraterrestrial” weapons, as well as “chemtrails” and “exotic weapons systems” such as HAARP.  A revised Space Preservation Act (HR 3657) eliminating the prohibitions on space-based extraterrestrial, chemtrails, and exotic weapons systems was introduced to the 108th Congress on January 23, 2002. ICIS continues to lobby for a Space Preservation Treaty conference where leaders of the world would gather to ban space weapons. Supported by former Canadian Defence Minister Paul Hellyer who believes that this treaty would help put a cap on the war industry and open the door for international cooperation in outer space exploration. Thus, transforming the “war based” economy into a “peace based” economy.

The ICIS board was made up of various prominent individuals such as former astronauts Edgar Mitchell and Dr. Brian O’Leary, and formerly the late Arthur C. Clarke, General Counsel Daniel Sheehan and John McConnell who is the founder of International Earth Day.[16] Alfred Webre resigned from the Board of Directors of ICIS on January 1, 2011 to focus on a treaty to ban HAARP, which he alleges to be a weapon.[10]

Exopolitics

The term exopolitics, in the meaning of political relations within the scope of the universe, was discussed as early as in 1977 by Timothy Leary. Webre believes that there is intelligentextraterrestrial life in our universe. He is the author of the online e-bookTowards a Decade of Contact (2000) (which contains his first discussion of exopolitics) and the book Exopolitics: Politics, Government, and Law in the Universe (2005). The exopolitics model functionally maps the operation of politics, government and law in an intelligent universe, and provides an operational bridge between models of terrestrial politics, government and law, and the larger models of politics, government and law in the proposed society of the greater universe.

Webre believes that as exopolitics posits, the truest conception of our human circumstance may be that we are on an isolated planet in the midst of a populated, evolving, highly organized inter-planetary, inter-galactic, multi-dimensional universe society. He believes that we live on a planet that has been quarantined (the Zoo Hypothesis) and that we are now being given an opportunity to join the rest of the spiritually evolved universe society in peace, thus an opportunity to avoid environmental global self-destruction or global self-destruction through war.

On March 10, 2007, Webre launched the Exopolitics Radio program, hosted by 1480 KPHX (which at the time was the Air America Radio affiliate, and Nova M Radio flagship station, in Phoenix) until the fall of 2008; the program remained in production until March 2009 and is distributed via podcast on its own website.[19] Guests on the program have generally advocated similar views to Webre, and many are well known within the UFO research/enthusiast (and to a lesser extent the New Age) community.

In 2011, the Australian publication Veritas Magazine asked Webre to review the first decade of Exopolitics (approximately 2000–2010). The first decade of Exopolitics includes approximately 30 nations releasing their secret extraterrestrial and UFO files; “exopolitics” being nominated for word of the year in 2005; exopolitical organizations active in approximately 40 nations

In April 2012, Webre launched ExoUniversity.org, an educational entity offering online education in exo-sciences, psi-sciences, and exopolitics, with an Earth Day forum entitled “An Introduction to Time Travel with an Emphasis on Teleportation.”

Books [edit]

Videos [edit]

 

Obama’s ‘limited strike’ already looks like major regional conflagration

The most prominent fact on display in the G-20 summit in Russia, is Obama’s total isolation in the international arena, as demonstrated by the unproductive face-to-face meeting between Obama and Putin [Link] and the refusal of all but France and Canada to back his war plan. This weakness further emphasizes the ‘wounded beast’ mode the Obama regime has been at ever since its crushing defeat in Egypt. As we have warned back then, the beast is extremely dangerous when wounded, so we must assume the greatest danger is still ahead of us.

The abrupt decision last week to call off the Tomahawk strikes inevitably led to the nullification of their predicted effect , since the Syrian regime has used the time to evacuate sensitive facilities and disperse its forces in order to reduce the damage they expect to sustain from Obama’s strike. Actually this has already happened 10 years ago during the Iraq war when the concept of “shock and awe” was tested and failed due to similar reasons. Back then it was only the extensive buy-up of Iraqi officers by the CIA which saved the US military from trouble in the invasion phase of the war. Such a buy-up is not expected this time around in Syria, as far as we can see.

This inherent diplomatic and military weakness of the American position in the region forces US strategists to vastly expand the original attack plan (as reported by ABC and WSJ) and include strategic USAF stealth bombers (by definition, the ‘doomsday weapons’) in order to make up for the inherent weakness of the earlier Tomahawk strike plan. This enhanced plan alone virtually guarantees a wider regional conflict ,simply because miscalculations by all participants are becoming inevitable in such a stressful situation (even if we assume that the Syrians and their backers in China and Russia will try to maintain restraint in face of the American attack).

From Obama’s perspective, this heavy handed direct intervention is necessary also for the purpose of saving his Al Qaeda ‘rebels’ from total defeat, especially now that the Syrian armyhas crushed the much celebrated incursion of the CIA’s 300 Jordanian guerrillas into Southern Syria, which was presumably supervised from CENTCOM’s underground war room in Jordan.

The Mediterranean puddle is becoming crowded by the minute as the super powers mobilize as many of their naval assets as they possibly can [see this Infographic ]. The recent news on Friday suggest that China is about to jump into the party by sending a marines brigade and an electronic warfare ship. Since any Strike on Syria would battle-test Chinese radars in possession of the Syrian army, we can assume the Chinese would like to snoop around in order to better prepare themselves for “America’s pacific century” in the South China sea.

All of the above has put America in a lose-lose situation. If they back down in face of the Russo-Chinese resistance, they will lose their last shreds of credibility and prowess. If they insist on putting their money where their mouth is, they risk a major regional conflagration with unpredictable results,possibly leading to a third world war. Obviously Obama and his lunatic handlers prefer the second option regardless of the price that will be borne by the average Joe in the U.S., and Obama is the last man on Earth who can handle such a complex strategic crisis-  a direct result of his foolish”red line” and even more foolish and hectic decision making process as demonstrated in last week’s abrupt and chaotic change of plans, without even consulting his cabinet.

The globalist plan to bomb Syria, of course, has nothing to do with chemical weapons. It is about the last gasp for the Petro-Dollar, the emergence of energy pipeline geopolitics, the rise of the NatGas Co-op, the new dominance of Russian Gazprom, the eclipse of OPEC, the fall of the house of Saud, and a grand adjustment process in global commerce and banking. [see this very extensive analysis here] . The stakes are much too high now for them to just walk into the sunset, so it should be assumed they are capable of doing anything to get their war. Perhaps a major false flag of some sort, perhaps some more subtle diplomatic blackmail behind the scenes. we’ll know soon enough, but either way, the sad truth is that western civilization currently depends more  on luck then on a non-existent sane and capable leadership .

US attack on Syria, war of aggression

syria2

 

 

 

 

Interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre

WATCH INTERVIEW:
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/08/30/321267/us-attack-on-syria-war-of-aggression/

“If we look at the law of the UN Charter it is clear that wars of aggression are prohibited and it would be clear that if the US were to attack Syria, that would be the commencement of a war of aggression.”

Press TV has conducted an interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, international lawyer, about the United States and some of its allies, including France and Israel, still threatening military strike against Syria over false claims about the role of Damascus in a recent deadly chemical attack.

What follows is an approximate transcription of the interview.

Press TV: Mr. Webre, first of all we know that according to the British parliament the UK does not have permission now from its own MPs to get involved militarily but the United States has suggested that it is going to go it alone.

With no report yet on the part of the United Nations and no agreement or no UN mandate, what could a possible move by the United States mean in terms of international law?

Webre: Well it seems rather clear that this appears to be a replay of what the George W. Bush administration launched a war of aggression against Iraq in 2003 on the basis of a false flag operation and its false claims that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and this is the exact analogy and George W. Bush and Tony Blair and the Bush administration have been adjudged war criminals because of this.

If we look at the law of the UN Charter it is clear that wars of aggression are prohibited and it would be clear that if the US were to attack Syria, that would be the commencement of a war of aggression.

Article 2, Section 4 of the UN Charter states all members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.

And the only exception is the right of collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a member of the United Nations which is not the case here and in fact we now have mounting evidence that the gas attack against the people of Syria was in fact the false flag attack.

This is a former PLO member, a native speaker Walid Shoebat which shows for example that there is a video showing the Free Syrian Army or FSA rebel forces launching a sarin gas attack on a Syria village. There is another YouTube that shows what appears to be Syrian rebel forces loading a canister of nerve gas on a rocket to fire presumably at civilians and possibly government forces.

And I have seen and I am looking at what appeared to be canisters in the sea to rebel arsenal from Jobar that appeared to resemble the canister launched by rebel forces initially. These are canisters of sarin gas.

And in a Syrian television report you can see a chemical agent and I am looking at the picture now that was identified has having been made in a Saudi Arabian factory.

In fact you can go to the Russian channel RT and an Arabian language channel shows captured rebel arsenals apparently with chemical agents manufactured in Saudi Arabia as well as gas mask, supporting the Russian claims that the rebels here are the culprits in the alleged chemical attack i.e. is a false flag attempted to provide a pretext for the attack by the US which itself would be a violation of the UN Charter and a war of aggression.

Press TV: Mr. Webre, just quickly before we leave you, we are hearing the United States say now that when we are going to decide on the Syria’s situation, we are going to consider the United States national interest.

I wonder what that means, you know if we want to get into the meaning of this, what is America trying to say by considering America’s national interest in this decision?

We earlier heard the French President also saying that France considers the chemical attack as a threat to global peace apparently in defense of the argument that this could actually be some kind of self-defense. So what is your argument here?

Webre: Well the arguments are that in all phases of this war starting with the false flag operation of September 11, 2001 to the Iraq war, the false claims of weapons of mass destruction and now to the Syrian case where we can see that there are apparently pictures of sarin gas attacks manufactured in Saudi Arabia and launched by the FSA as a false flag attack, that these are the standard operating procedures of the US forces and of the military and intelligence assets of the US forces carrying out a false flag operation which always proceeds their attempted war of aggression.

So they are just following their own military intelligence manuals. It means absolutely nothing in the world of truth. What it means is that this is part and parcel of the lead-up to a war of aggression and it is a real question as to which nations are going to stand up in the United Nations at the Security Council, at the International Criminal Court, in the various courts and tribunals and bring this war criminal nation to justice, both Israel and the United States which are war crimes nations. It is utterly clear in the UN Charter.
syria-chemical-weapons-3

 

 

 

***
US FORCES ASSETS’ STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE: CONDUCT FALSE FLAG WITH WMD, BEGIN WAR OF AGGRESSION
— forward from Before It’s News

Alfred Lambremont Webre, international lawyer and War Crimes Tribunal Judge, said Friday on Press TV that “it seems rather clear that this appears to be a replay of what the George W. Bush administration launched a war of aggression against Iraq in 2003 on the basis of a false flag operation and its false claims that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.”

“This is the exact analogy and George W. Bush and Tony Blair and the Bush administration have been adjudged war criminals because of this,” Webre said.

Article 2, Section 4 of the UN Charter states: All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.

“And the only exception is the right of collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a member of the United Nations which is not the case here, Webre said. “In fact, we now have mounting evidence that the gas attack against the people of Syria was in fact the false flag attack,” Webre said.

“Nor is the ‘Responsibility to Protect – R2P’ doctrine, requiring states to protect their populations against genocides, added by the Western powers in 2005 as a way around the UN Charter to support interventionism, applicable in the case of Syria, as the evidence shows that U.S. allies are most probably responsible for the gas attacks on the Syrian public.”

Regarding the chemical attack, Webre points to several documentations on video showing Saudis directly involved in the provision and use of the chemicals on Syrians and rebel forces applying the gases.

“The rebels are the culprits in this false flag attack,” stated Webre.

In response to French President saying France considers the chemical attack a threat to global peace, apparently in defense of the argument of striking Syria being “some kind of self-defense,” Webre asserted, “Well the arguments are that in all phases of this war starting with the false flag operation of September 11, 2001 to the Iraq war, the false claims of weapons of mass destruction.

“And now to the Syrian case, where we can see that there are apparently pictures of sarin gas attacks manufactured in Saudi Arabia and launched by the FSA as a false flag attack, that these are the standard operating procedures of the US forces and of the military and intelligence assets of the US forces carrying out a false flag operation which always proceeds their attempted war of aggression.

“So they are just following their own military intelligence manuals,” Webre said. “It means absolutely nothing in the world of truth.

“It is a real question as to which nations are going to stand up in the United Nations at the Security Council, at the International Criminal Court, in the various courts and tribunals and bring [these] war criminal nation[s] to justice, both Israel and the United States.”

“It is utterly clear in the UN Charter.”

Comments:

Kenneth Hunt CONSIDER THIS and if you agree copy and paste to your status.

The American people have made it quite clear to congress and the administration that we do not want to intervene in Syria’s civil war. If they do this anyway, despite the will of the people, and most likely they will, then we have a rogue government. There is no other way to look at it. We the people have the power and the responsibility to shut this country down. Do not go to work, do not pay a bill, do not spend a dime and do not take it to the streets. We have time to prepare now for such an action and the sacrifices you may have to make to do this will be much less than the sacrifices you will be forced to make when we are involved in WWIII. This is the real power of the masses, we may have to use it.
Syria2

ALAS SYRIA: KUSINICH WARNS SYRIA STRIKE WOULD MAKE U.S. ‘AL QAEDA’S AIR FORCE,’ COULD SPARK ‘WORLD WAR THREE’

syria2

Former Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) cautioned against hasty military action in Syria during a Tuesday interview with The Hill, claiming that air strikes would help al Qaeda and lead to much broader conflict.

“So what, we’re about to become Al Qaeda’s air force now?” Kucinich said, presumably referring to reports that the terrorist group has also vowed “revenge” on Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime. “This is a very, very serious matter that has broad implications internationally. And to try to minimize it by saying we’re just going to have a ‘targeted strike’ — that’s an act of war. It’s not anything to be trifled with.”

The Obama administration has confirmed its belief that Assad is responsible for killing as many as 1,000 innocent civilians in a chemical attack last week. The United Nations also concluded that a chemical substance was used in the strike, but has yet to determine that it came from Assad’s forces, who have accused rebel forces of also using chemical weapons.

While momentum for retaliatory military action builds in the West, Kucinich told The Hill that it would be unwise to rush into a decision that could possibly lead to “World War Three.”

Kucinich also suggested that it would be unconstitutional for Obama to order a strike without congressional approval, a viewpoint that both the president and Vice President Joe Biden once shared as members of Congress. The Ohio Democrat made a similar argument in 2011, claiming that it could be an impeachable offense for Obama to take military action in Libya without first consulting lawmakers.

Kucinich has attracted scrutiny for his input on Syria in the past. In 2011, he went on a “fact-finding” mission to the Middle Eastern nation, a trip that gave rise to reports by state-owned media claiming that Kucinich had lavished praise on Assad for his willingness to “negotiate.” Kucinich’s office responded by saying that the then-congressman’s actual comments had been “lost in translation.”
***

SYRIANS SCRAMBLE TO HIDE FROM OBAMA’S HUMANITARIAN LOVE BOMBS

“Every neighborhood has some government target. Where do we hide?” by Paul Joseph Watson

Despite the US and Britain justifying an imminent attack on Syria in the name of “protecting civilians,” Syrians themselves are scrambling to hide from Obama’s humanitarian love bombs, with one Damascus resident telling Reuters, “We live in the capital. Every turn, every street, every neighborhood has some government target. Where do we hide?”

Although a torrent of criticism has forced both Washington and London to move towards some kind of symbolic gesture involving the United Nations, a senior US official told NBC News today “we’re past the point of return” and that US air strikes against Syrian targets would inevitably occur “within days.”

That leaves thousands of Syrians living in major cities already ravaged by nearly two years of civil war and western-backed Al-Qaeda terrorist attacks looking up to the skies in anticipation of a fresh delivery of cruise missiles – all in the name of “protecting civilians” of course.

As Reuters reports, “dozens of military sites are mixed in among the civilian population,” meaning that western attacks will almost inevitably mean more loss of life, not to mention the wider threat of a new war in the Middle East.

Syrians have now begun hoarding supplies, including water, batteries, and food, with “the fear in people’s eyes” all too visible, while banks have been inundated with customers attempting to withdraw all their money.

People are fleeing in an effort to rent houses away from military sites, but many cannot afford skyrocketing prices in safer areas.

“What about my friend?” asked a woman whose family was lucky enough to be lent a house in a safe area. “Her whole family lives in this neighborhood. There is no place for them to go.”

With Syria about to become the 7th country to be on the receiving end of the Peace Prize winner’s humanitarian lovefest, let us not forget the fantastic success that this policy of taking a complex political problem and bombing it had in Libya.

Just as it did in Libya, the US is about to become “Al-Qaeda’s air force,” paving the way for extremist jihadists to seize power and turn Syria into their personal thug-rule thiefdom.

Two years after Obama’s love bombs rained down in Tripoli, Libya is now plagued by violence and chaos, has seen its economy collapse, is controlled by brutal tribes who imprison and torture their alleged political adversaries, and has become “the main base for Al-Qaeda in the Maghreb.”

Now it’s Syria’s turn to experience what happens to countries who dare assert their sovereignty by attempting to fight back against an invasion of NATO and Gulf state-supplied terrorists.

Those Syrians who do manage to hide from Obama and Cameron’s humanitarian love bombs may escape death but the future of their country might not be much worth living for.

WAR MEDIA CONJURES WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AHEAD OF OBAMA’S SYRIA ATTACK by Hans Blix

Time Magazine is calling for Obama to use Clinton’s illegal 1998 Operation Desert Fox bombing campaign as a template when he bombs Syria, possibly tomorrow. Clinton’s foray into organized mass murder – designed in part to distract from his dalliance with Monica Lewinsky – lasted four days and killed hundreds of Iraqis. According to the United States, a barrage of cruise missiles were fired into Iraq to “degrade” Saddam Hussein’s ability to produce weapons of mass destruction, weapons sold to him by the United States.

Hans Blix: western media pushing war agenda ahead of Syria attack.

Time says the “trigger” for the coming bombing of Syria will be its weapons of mass destruction and “use of chemical weapons in suburbs of the Syrian capital that killed hundreds of civilians,” an “indiscriminate” attack the United States and its corporate propaganda machine say al-Assad maliciously conducted despite the fact there is absolutely no evidence he did anything of the sort.
Time insists the attack will be “rooted in weapons of mass destruction” and will target Syria’s military infrastructure. “It’ll probably be aimed at Syria’s command-and-control systems, the forces who might have been involved in using it, and maybe expanded to include higher headquarters that would have coordinated the operations,” Jeffrey White, a former Defense Intelligence Agency analyst now with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, told Time.

The corporate war propaganda media invariably trots out neocons and other professional warmongers when it peddles excuses for mass murder under the threadbare banner of subjective and politically expedient humanitarianism. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, WINEP for short, is a “think tank” linked to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and its “scholars” are interchangeable with those over at the American Enterprise Institute and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, neocon operations responsible for pushing the invasion of Iraq (death toll: approximately 1.5 million).

“It’s a lot easier to declare ‘mission accomplished’ when your objective is to blow up command posts, weapons depots and runways, instead of hunting down and destroying weapons of mass destruction, which can be elusive,” Time reports.

In fact, so elusive were Iraq’s WMDs, they were never found. George W. Bush, amply demonstrating the personality quirks of a psychopath, went so far as to contrive a stand-up comedy routine after it was conclusively demonstrated Iraq did not have WMDs. Bush and his cronies knew this.

Following Clinton’s bombing the war media told us the Pentagon went out of its way to spare innocent civilians. “While numerous Ba’ath security, intelligence, and military targets were destroyed, power and telephone systems were spared,” Michael Knights writes for the Washington Institute.

Clinton avoided bombing “dual-use infrastructure” because his predecessor had taken it out a few years before and punitive and medieval sanctions – ultimately claiming the lives of more than 500,000 Iraqi children – made sure Iraq never recovered.

“Bombing of Iraqi cities served no military purpose but was designed to destroy the civilian infrastructure,” David Model wrote in 2005. “War games in July 1990 in South Carolina trained pilots to bomb civilian targets and Pentagon statements about plans to bomb civilian targets in August and September 1990 are evidence that these targets were set well in advance of January 15, 1991.

Critical elements of the civilian infrastructure were destroyed including communication systems, oil refineries, electric generators, water treatment facilities, dams, and transportation centers. Over 90 percent of Iraq’s electrical capacity was destroyed in the first days of the bombing.

One of the most diabolical decisions in the campaign was to destroy Iraq’s water supply, resulting in the death of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children long after the war was over. The capacity of Iraq to produce food was severely limited by the attacks on agriculture, food processing, food storage and the food distribution system. Half of Iraq’s agricultural output depended on irrigation systems which were also targeted.

Syria will be similarly targeted, but you won’t hear about it in the war propaganda media.
Time concludes:

There will be claims from Syria of innocent civilians killed (Desert Fox killed up to 2,000 Iraqis) and complaints from Syrian allies Iran and Russia that the strikes violated international law, predicts Anthony Cordesman, a military scholar at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “But, at the end of it,” he says, “they probably won’t use chemical weapons again.”

That may be the good news, relatively speaking. The bad news is that there’s no idea of what comes next for Syria, already torn apart by a 30-month civil war that has killed an estimated 100,000 people, after the all-but-certain U.S. attack.

Time does not put the 100,000 figure in context – if indeed accurate, and we have no way to verify the number for certain, it is largely the result of a civil war fomented by the United States and the CIA with their dual-use al-Qaeda mercenaries. It is an engineered civil war designed to take out the government of Bashar al-Assad and usher in a generation or more of failed state chaos in Syria.

“The conditions in Iraq ten years after the invasion do not look bright,” writes Fatih Abdulsalam. “There are more signs of division rather than unity, more signs of separation rather than coming together in regard to almost everything in the country.”

Following Obama’s attack, and subsequent attacks after the first one will undoubtedly prove insufficient, Syria’s future will also not look bright.

Once again, weapons of mass destruction serve as a pretext for a different agenda – the destruction of Syria and its removal as a geopolitical player in the region, an area increasingly dominated by the United States.

WAR LOOMS: HUNDREDS OF AMERICAN TROOPS AND CIA OPERATIVES HAVE ENTERED SYRIA

Syria
While the media panicked over the halting of NASDAQ stock trading due to a reported bug in the system (more on that shortly), one critical development went under-reported. In fact, it wasn’t reported at all.

If the following from France’s second largest newspaper Le Figaro is accurate, then we must assume that war is now a foregone conclusion.

According to our information, the regime’s opponents, supervised by Jordanian, Israeli and American commandos moving towards Damascus since mid-August. This attack could explain the possible use of the Syrian president to chemical weapons.

According to information obtained by Le Figaro , the first trained in guerrilla warfare by the Americans in Jordan Syrian troops reportedly entered into action since mid-August in southern Syria, in the region of Deraa. A first group of 300 men, probably supported by Israeli and Jordanian commandos, as well as men of the CIA, had crossed the border on August 17. A second would have joined the 19. According to military sources, the Americans, who do not want to put troops on the Syrian soil or arming rebels in part controlled by radical Islamists form quietly for several months in a training camp set up at the border Jordanian- Syrian fighters ASL, the Free Syrian Army, handpicked.

Translation via Google

What’s equally as intriguing as boots on the ground inside of the Syrian border is the fact that these troops and intelligence officers reportedly made their way into the country on August 17th, fully four days before reports and images surfaced showing hundreds of men, women and children killed by a chemical weapons attack allegedly at the hands of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

The purported attack, which some experts argue was a set-up, left even the pacifist government of France calling for military intervention. Furthermore, should UN investigators, who conveniently happen to be in-country investigating possible chemical weapons stockpiles, confirm that the attack did take place, then we can expect armed military confrontation in the middle east once again.

Of interest is also the fact the NASDAQ stock market exchange was halted today due to what NASDAQ officials call a technical glitch. Within hours of the ‘glitch’ cyber security experts suggested that this was no accident, but rather, a hack attack originating from the “hacking collective” known as the Cyber Fighters of Izz ad-Din al-Qassam, an Iranian backed organization.

Earlier this week President Obama met with the heads of the Federal Reserve, the SEC, the FDIC and several other agencies responsible for monitoring and implementing U.S. financial, economic and monetary policy, indicating that there could be a serious crisis unfolding behind the scenes of our financial system. This comes on the heels of the Federal Reserve claiming that they would begin to “taper” the stimulus, a move that would likely send massive shock waves through domestic and global stock markets.

This is all speculation, of course, but it’s hard to ignore the fact that the US financial system is potentially on the brink of a massive re-collapse, while the Obama administration is actively engaging Syria in what we can only conclude will lead to a broader conflict in the middle east.

Throughout history governments have deflected blame for economic disasters by turning their efforts to a far off enemy and going to war. It’s certainly no accident and it’s a forecast that contrarian observers have made repeatedly as the global economic crisis deepened.

Is this what we’re seeing play out right now?

If so, then the implications are far reaching, because anyone who thinks this is going to be another Iraq are kidding themselves. This time, the Russians and the Chinese have a stake in the game, and they too have been positioning pieces on the Grand Chessboard. Not only have the Russians already advised western nations that the Syrians will be armed with weapons never before seen in the middle east, but they have warned that any military confrontation in the region could potentially go nuclear.

The question then becomes: who were the Russians talking about?

Syria doesn’t have nuclear weapons. Neither does Iran (at least not for a few more months if Israeli intelligence reports are to be believed).

But the United States, Israel, Russia and China do have nukes.

Thus, one can only conclude that the Russians were talking about a nuclear engagement between them… and us.

It’s a realistic possibility also put forth by survival specialist Joel Skousen in his documentary Strategic Relocation and a warning reiterated by a DHS Insider who claimed in June of 2013 that a World War was about to break out and would lead to the deaths of millions.

This is getting real folks. All signs point to a serious confrontation in our near future.

This article has been contributed by SHTF Plan. Visit www.SHTFplan.com for alternative news, commentary and preparedness info.

http://beforeitsnews.com/survival/2013/08/report-war-looms-hundreds-of-american-troops-and-cia-operatives-have-entered-syria-2485824.html?utm_campaign=&utm_medium=facebook-share&utm_content=awesm-publisher&utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F&utm_term=http%3A%2F%2Fb4in.info%2FgFnu

Source: http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/report-war-looms-hundreds-of-american-troops-and-cia-operatives-have-entered-syria_08232013