Get Adobe Flash player

Aquarian Radio

U.S’s 911 War Crimes: Twin Tower Murders, Occupation of Iraq & Afganistan, Suppression of American Freedoms, Induction of Muslim Hate-Chossudovski’s Review on Web Radio

Sept 11, 2001, the world changed, the freedoms we thought we had were curtailed and the kill and hate Muslims campaign began.

click arrow and listen

 

Michel Chossudovsky’s Presentation to the 9/11 Revisited conference in Malaysia

 YOU TUBE http://youtu.be/p5mlmc9fJyU911 1

911 2 911 3911

 


911 3a bombers

 

911 3b Bahdad hit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

911 4 Mission AccomplishedSeptember 11, 2001: The Crimes of War Committed “in the Name of 9/11″ Initiating a Legal Procedure against the Perpetrators of 9/11 Michel Chossudovsky

* * *

 

1 Bush sends troops

 

International Conference on “9/11 Revisited – Seeking the Truth” Kuala Lumpur, November 2012

The tragic events of September 11, 2001 constitute a fundamental landmark in American history, a decisive watershed, a breaking point.

Millions of people have been misled regarding the causes and consequences of 9/11.

September 11 2001 opens up an era of crisis, upheaval and militarization of American society. The post September 11, 2001 era is marked by the outright criminalization of the US State, including its judicial, foreign policy, national security and intelligence apparatus.

9/11 marks the onslaught of the “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT), used as a pretext and a justification by the US and its NATO allies to carry out a “war without borders”, a global war of conquest.

A far-reaching overhaul of US military doctrine was launched in the wake of 9/11.

9/11 was also a stepping stone towards the relentless repeal of civil liberties, the militarization of law enforcement and the  inauguration of “Police State USA”.

In assessing the crimes associated with 9/11 in the context of a legal procedure, we must distinguish between those associated with the actual event, namely the loss of life and the destruction of property on 9/11, from the crimes committed in the aftermath of September 11, 2001 “in the name of 9/11″.

The latter build upon the former. We are dealing with two related dimensions of criminality. The crimes committed “in the name of 9/11″ involving acts of war are far-reaching, resulting in the deaths of millions of people as well as the destruction of entire countries.

The 9/11 event in itself– which becomes symbolic– is used to justify the onslaught of the post 9/11 US-NATO military agenda, under the banner of the “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT), not to mention the ushering in of the Homeland police state and the repeal of civil liberties.

The crimes committed in the name of 9/11 broadly consist in two intimately related processes:

1. The launching of the “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT), used as a pretext and a justification to Wage a War of Conquest. This GWOT mandate was used to justify the 2001 and 2003 invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. The GWOT mandate has since extended its grip to a large number of countries in Africa, the Middle East and Southeast Asia, where the US and its NATO allies are intervening selectively under a counterterrorism mandate.

2. The derogation of civil liberties and the instatement of an Orwellian police state apparatus within Western countries. In the US, the introduction of the PATRIOT legislation and the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security in the immediate wake of the 9/11 attacks set the stage for the subsequent restructuring of the judicial and law enforcement apparatus, culminating in the legalization of extrajudicial assassinations under an alleged counter-terrorism mandate.

The 9/11 attacks constitute what is referred to in intelligence parlance as a “massive casualty producing event” conducive to the deaths of civilians.

The dramatic loss of life on the morning of 9/11 resulting from an initial criminal act is used as a pretext and a justification to wage an all out war of retribution, in the name of 9/11 against the alleged perpetrators of  9/11, namely the “state sponsors of terrorism”, including Afghanistan, Iraq as well as Iran.

We are dealing with a diabolical and criminal project. The civilian deaths resulting from the 911 attacks are an instrument of war propaganda, applied to build a consensus in favor of an outright war of global domination.

The perpetrators of war propaganda are complicit in the conduct of extensive war crimes, in that they readily justify acts of war as counter-terrorism and/or humanitarian operations (R2P) launched to protect civilians. The “Just War” concept prevails: The killing of civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq are “rightfully” undertaken in retribution for the deaths incurred on 9/11.

Evidence is fabricated to the effect that the “state sponsors of terrorism” had committed, on the morning of 9/11, an outright act of war against the United States.

Realities are turned upside down. The US and its allies are the victims of foreign aggression. America’s crimes of war in Afghanistan and Iraq are committed in the name of 9/11 under a counter terrorism mandate.

The 9/11 attacks are used to harness public opinion into supporting a war without borders. Endless wars of aggression under the humanitarian cloak of “counter-terrorism” are set in motion.

Chronology of Events

At eleven o’clock, on the morning of September 11, the Bush administration had already announced that Al Qaeda was responsible for the attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) and the Pentagon. This assertion was made prior to the conduct of an in-depth police investigation.

CIA Director George Tenet stated that same morning that Osama bin Laden had the capacity to plan “multiple attacks with little or no warning.”

Secretary of State Colin Powell called the attacks “an act of war” and President Bush confirmed in an evening televised address to the Nation that he would “make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those [foreign governments] who harbor them”.

Former CIA Director James Woolsey, without mentioning Afghanistan, pointed his finger at “state sponsorship,” implying the complicity of one or more foreign governments. In the words of former National Security Adviser, Lawrence Eagleburger, “I think we will show when we get attacked like this, we are terrible in our strength and in our retribution.”

That same evening at 9:30 pm, a “War Cabinet” was formed integrated by a select number of top intelligence and military advisors. And at 11:00 pm, at the end of that historic meeting at the White House, the “War on Terrorism” was officially launched.

The war cabinet had decided to launch an an illegal and criminal war on Afghanistan, based on essentially two interrelated concepts:

1. The 9/11 attacks although allegedly conducted by Al Qaeda were upheld as an all out military attack by a foreign power.

2. Afghanistan in allegedly supporting Al Qaeda, was responsible for an act of military aggression directed against the United States of America.

The tragic events of 9/11 provided the required justification to wage war on Afghanistan on “humanitarian grounds”, with the full support of World public opinion and the endorsement of the “international community”. Several prominent intellectuals made a case for “retaliation against terrorism”, on moral and ethical grounds. In taking on this stance they provided legitimacy to the conduct of war crimes. The “just cause” military doctrine was accepted and upheld at face value as a legitimate response to 9/11.

In the wake of 9/11, the antiwar movement was completely isolated. The trade unions and civil society organizations had swallowed the media lies and government propaganda. They had accepted a war of retribution against Afghanistan, an impoverished country in Central Asia of 30 million people.

The myth of the “outside enemy” and the threat of “Islamic terrorists” was the cornerstone of the Bush administration’s military doctrine, used as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, not to mention the repeal of civil liberties and constitutional government in America. The post 9/11 era was also characterised by the development of Islamophobia, including routine ethnic profiling directed against Muslims.

Where was Osama bin Laden on September 11, 2001?

Is there any proof to the effect that Osama bin Laden, the bogeyman, coordinated the 9/11 attacks as claimed in the official 9/11 narrative?

According to CBS news (Dan Rather, January 28, 2002), “Enemy Number One” was admitted to the urology ward of a Pakistani military hospital in Rawalpindi on September 10, 2001, courtesy of America’s indefectible ally Pakistan. Rawalpindi is the Headquarters of the Pakistani military including its intelligence apparatus. He could have been arrested at short notice which would have “saved us a lot of trouble”, but then we would not have had an Osama Legend, which has fed the news chain as well as presidential speeches.

DAN RATHER. As the United states and its allies in the war on terrorism press the hunt for Osama bin Laden, CBS News has exclusive information tonight about where bin Laden was and what he was doing in the last hours before his followers struck the United States September 11.

This is the result of hard-nosed investigative reporting by a team of CBS news journalists, and by one of the best foreign correspondents in the business, CBS`s Barry Petersen. Here is his report.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) BARRY PETERSEN, CBS CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Everyone remembers what happened on September 11. Here`s the story of what may have happened the night before. It is a tale as twisted as the hunt for Osama bin Laden.

CBS News has been told that the night before the September 11 terrorist attack, Osama bin Laden was in Pakistan. He was getting medical treatment with the support of the very military that days later pledged its backing for the U.S. war on terror in Afghanistan. (transcript of CBS report.

CBS News footage of the Rawalpindi, Pakistan, hospital where bin Laden was allegedly treated the day before 9/11. [Source: CBS News]

The foregoing CBS report which is of utmost relevance indicates two obvious facts:

1. Osama bin Laden could not reasonably have coordinated the 9/11 attacks from his hospital bed;

2. The hospital was under the jurisdiction of the Pakistani Armed Forces, which has close links to the Pentagon. Osama bin Laden’s whereabouts were known to both the Pakistani and US military.

U.S. military and intelligence advisers based in Rawalpindi. were working closely with their Pakistani counterparts. Again, no attempt was made to arrest America’s best known fugitive. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld claimed, at the time, that the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden were unknown. According to
Rumsfeld: “Its like looking for a needle in a stack of hay”.

Recovering from his hospital treatment in Rawalpindi on the 11th of September, how could Osama have coordinated the 9/11 attacks?

How could Afghanistan be made responsible for these attacks by Al Qaeda? Bin Laden is a national of Saudi Arabia who, according to CBS News, was not in Afghanistan, but in Pakistan at the time of the attacks.

September 12, 2001: The Invasion of Afghanistan: NATO’s Doctrine of Collective Security

The immediate response of the US and its NATO allies to the 9/11 attacks was to the declare a war of retribution against Afghanistan on the grounds that the Taliban government was protecting “terror mastermind” Osama bin Laden, who at the time of the attacks was in Pakistan, protected by the Pakistani military and intelligence apparatus. In a bitter irony, the Pakistani government and military, which had facilitated bin Laden’s hospitalization in Rawalpindi on September 10, offered to assist the US in “going after bin Laden”. An agreement
to this effect was reached on September 12 in Washington between the head of Pakistan’s military Intelligence (ISI) General Mahmoud Ahmed and Secretary Colin Powell.

Parroting official statements, the Western media mantra on September 12, 2001 had already approved the launching of “punitive actions” directed against civilian targets in Afghanistan. In the words of William Saffire writing in the New York Times: “When we reasonably determine our attackers’ bases and camps, we must pulverize them — minimizing but accepting the risk of collateral damage” — and act overtly or covertly to destabilize terror’s national hosts”.

By allegedly harboring bin Laden, the Afghan government was complicit, according to both the US administration and NATO, for having waged an act of war against the United States.

This decision was taken by the Bush-Cheney war cabinet in the evening of September 11, 2001. It was based on the presumption, “confirmed” by the head of the CIA that Al Qaeda was behind the attacks.

On the following morning, September 12, 2001, NATO’s Atlantic Council meeting in Brussels, endorsed the Bush administration’s declaration of war on Afghanistan (taken by the war cabinet at 11pm on September 11), invoking Article 5 of the Washington Treaty.

Meanwhile, on two occasions in the course of September 2001, the Afghan government –through diplomatic channels– offered to hand over Osama Bin laden to US Justice. These overtures were turned down by president Bush, on the grounds that America “does not negotiate with terrorists”.

The War on Afghanistan: First Stage of the “Global War on Terrorism”

The war on Afghanistan was launched 26 days later on the morning of October 7, 2001. The timing of this war begs the question: how long does it take to plan and implement a major theater war several thousand miles away.

Military analysts will confirm that a major theater war takes months and months, up to a year or more of advanced preparations. Confirmed by press reports, the war on Afghanistan was already in an advanced state of readiness
prior to September 11, 2001, which begs the question of foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks.

In other words, the 9/11 attacks were used as a means to trigger a military agenda which was already on the drawing board of both the Pentagon and NATO.

The repeal of civil liberties in America was launched in parallel with the bombing and invasion of Afghanistan. Immediately following 9/11, the PATRIOT legislation was adopted. The Homeland Security apparatus was launched, with a view to “protecting Americans against terrorists”. This post-911 legal and institutional framework had been carefully crafted prior to the 9/11 attacks.

Article 5 of the Washington Treaty: NATO’s Legal Argument

In invoking Article 5 on the morning of September 12, 2001, NATO’s Atlantic Council endorsed a criminal military agenda, in derogation of international law.

The legal argument used by Washington and NATO to invade Afghanistan was that the September 11 attacks constituted an undeclared “armed attack” “from abroad” by an unnamed foreign power, and that consequently “the laws of war” apply, allowing the nation under attack, to strike back in the name of “self-defense”.

On the morning of September 12, 2001, NATO’s North Atlantic Council meeting in Brussels, responded to the decision of the War Cabinet taken a few hours earlier at 11pm on 9/11, adopted the following resolution:

“if it is determined that the [September 11, 2001] attack against the United States was directed from abroad [Afghanistan] against “The North Atlantic area”, it shall be regarded as an action covered by Article 5 of the Washington Treaty”.

In this regard, Article 5 of the Washington Treaty stipulates that if:

“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.”

An act of war by a foreign nation (Afghanistan) against a member of the Atlantic Alliance (the USA) was considered as an act of war against all members under NATO’s doctrine of collective security.

Under no stretch of the imagination, can the attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon be categorized as an act of war by a foreign country. But nobody seemed to have raised this issue.

“Use of Armed Force” only “If It is Determined…”

There was an “if” in the September 12 resolution. Article 5 would apply only if it is determined that Afghanistan as a Nation State was complicit or behind the 9/11 attacks.

In practice, the “if” had already been waived prior to 9/11. The entire NATO arsenal was already on a war footing. In military terms, NATO and the US were already in an advanced state of readiness. Known to military analysts, but never revealed in the Western media, the implementation of a large scale theater war takes at least one year of advanced operational planning, prior to the launching of an invasion.

The use of article 5 of the Washington Treaty had in all likelihood been contemplated by military planners, as a pretext for waging war, prior to 9/11.

There was, however, no official declaration of war on September 12th. The Alliance waited until 3 days before the invasion to declare war on Afghanistan, an impoverished country which by no stretch of the imagination could have launched an attack against a member state of “The North Atlantic area”.

The September 12 resolution of the Atlantic Council required “determination” and corroborating evidence, that:

1) Al Qaeda led by Osama bin Laden with the support of a foreign power had ordered the “attack from abroad” on the United States of America; 2) The terrorist attacks of 9/11 constituted a bona fide military operation (under the provisions of Article 5) by an alleged foreign country (Afghanistan)

against a NATO member state, and consequently against all NATO member states under the doctrine of collective security:

“Article 5 and the case of the terrorist attacks against the United States: The United States has been the object of brutal terrorist attacks. It immediately consulted with the other members of the Alliance. The Alliance determined that the US had been the object of an armed attack. The Alliance therefore agreed that if it was determined that this attack was directed from abroad, it would be regarded as covered by Article 5. NATO Secretary General, Lord Robertson, subsequently informed the Secretary-General of the United Nations of the
Alliance’s decision.

Article 5 has thus been invoked, but no determination has yet been made whether the attack against the United States was directed from abroad. If such a determination is made, each Ally will then consider what assistance it should provide. In practice, there will be consultations among the Allies. Any collective action by NATO will be decided by the North Atlantic Council. The United States can also carry out independent actions, consistent with its rights and obligations under the UN Charter.

Allies can provide any form of assistance they deem necessary to respond to the situation. This assistance is not necessarily military and depends on the material resources of each country. Each individual member determines how it will contribute and will consult with the other members, bearing in mind that the ultimate aim is to “to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area”.

By invoking Article 5, NATO members have shown their solidarity toward the United States and condemned, in the strongest possible way, the terrorist attacks against the United States on 11 September.

If the conditions are met for the application of Article 5, NATO Allies will decide how to assist the United States. (Many Allies have clearly offered emergency assistance). Each Ally is obliged to assist the United States by
taking forward, individually and in concert with other Allies, such action as it deems necessary. This is an individual obligation on each Ally and each Ally is responsible for determining what it deems necessary in these particular circumstances.

No collective action will be taken by NATO until further consultations are held and further decisions are made by the the North Atlantic Council.

The Mysterious Frank Taylor Report

The final decision to invoke Article 5 in relation to the 9/11 attacks came three weeks later upon the submission to the NATO Council of a mysterious classified report by a US State Department official named Frank Taylor. The
report was submitted to NATO on October 2nd, 5 days before the commencement of the bombing and invasion of Afghanistan.

Frank Taylor was working in the US State Department. He had been entrusted with the writing of a brief to establish whether the US “had been attacked from abroad”, pursuant to the North Atlantic Council’s resolution of September 12, 2001.

US Ambassador at Large and Co-ordinator for Counter-terrorism Frank Taylor briefed the North Atlantic Council on October 2nd, five days before the commencement of the bombings.

On October 2nd he handed his brief to NATO “on the results of investigations into the 11 September attacks…. ” 

The classified report was not released to the media. And to this date, to our knowledge, it has remained classified.

NATO’s Secretary General Lord Robertson casually summarised the substance of the Frank Taylor report in a press release:  “This morning, the United States briefed the North Atlantic Council on the results of the investigation into who was responsible for the horrific terrorist attacks which took place on September 11.

The briefing was given by Ambassador Frank Taylor, the United States Department of State Coordinator for Counter-terrorism.

This morning’s briefing follows those offered by United States Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and United States Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, and illustrates the commitment of the United States to maintain close cooperation with Allies.

Today’s was classified briefing and so I cannot give you all the details.

Briefings are also being given directly by the United States to the Allies in their capitals.

The briefing addressed the events of September 11 themselves, the results of the investigation so far, what is known about Osama bin Laden and the al-Qaida organisation and their involvement in the attacks and in previous terrorist activity, and the links between al-Qaida and the Taliban regime in Afghanistan.

The facts are clear and compelling. The information presented points conclusively to an al-Qaida role in the September 11 attacks.

We know that the individuals who carried out these attacks were part of the world-wide terrorist network of al-Qaida, headed by Osama bin Laden and his key     lieutenants and protected by the Taliban.

On the basis of this briefing, it has now been determined that the attack against the United States on September 11 was directed from abroad and shall therefore be regarded as an action covered by Article 5 of the Washington
Treaty, which states that an armed attack on one or more of the Allies in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all.

I want to reiterate that the United States of America can rely on the full support of its 18 NATO Allies in the campaign against terrorism.” 

In other words, 2 days before the actual commencement of the bombing campaign on October 7, the North Atlantic Council decided, based on the information provided by Frank Taylor to the Council “that the attacks were directed from abroad” by Al Qaeda, headed by Osama bin Laden, thereby requiring an action on the part of NATO under Article 5 of the Washington Treaty

NATO action under article 5, was outlined in an October 4 decision, 3 days before the commencement of the bombings.

Two days later, on 4 October, NATO agreed on eight measures in support the United States, which were tantamount to an illegal declaration of war on Afghanistan:

to enhance intelligence sharing and co-operation, both bilaterally and in appropriate NATO bodies, relating to the threats posed by terrorism and the actions to be taken against it;

to provide, individually or collectively, as appropriate and according to their capabilities, [military] assistance to Allies and other states which are or may be subject to increased terrorist threats as a result of their support for the
campaign against terrorism; to take necessary measures to provide increased security for facilities of the United States and other Allies on their territory; to backfill selected Allied assets in NATO’s area of responsibility that are required to directly support operations against terrorism;

to provide blanket overflight clearances for the United States and other Allies’ aircraft, in accordance with the necessary air traffic arrangements and national procedures, for military flights related to operations against terrorism; to provide access for the United States and other Allies to ports and airfields on the territory of NATO nations for operations against terrorism, including for refuelling, in accordance with national procedures;

that the Alliance is ready to deploy elements of its Standing Naval Forces to the Eastern Mediterranean in order to provide a NATO presence and demonstrate resolve; and that the Alliance is similarly ready to deploy elements of its NATO Airborne Early Warning Force to support operations against terrorism.

Press reports of Frank Taylor’s brief to the NATO Council were scanty. The invocation of Article 5, five days before the bombings commenced, was barely mentioned. The media consensus was: “all roads lead to Bin Laden” as if bin Laden was a Nation State which had attacked America.

What stands out are outright lies and fabrications. Moreover, prior to October 2nd, NATO had no pretext under Article 5 of the Washington Treaty to intervene militarily in Afghanistan.

The pretext was provided by Frank Taylor’s classified report, which was not made public.

The two UN Security Council resolutions adopted in the course of September 2001, did not, under any circumstances, provide a justification for the invasion and illegal occupation of a UN member country of 28 million people. (see Security Council resolution 1368 (2001) Threats to international peace and security
caused by terrorist acts, Security Council resolution 1373 (2001) Threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts).

UNSC Resolution 1373 (2001) called for prevention and suppression of terrorist
acts, as well suppression of the financing of terrorism:

“(e) Ensure that any person who participates in the financing, planning,
preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or in supporting terrorist acts is
brought to justice and ensure that, in addition to any other measures against
them, such terrorist acts are established as serious criminal offences in
domestic laws and regulations and that the punishment duly reflects the
seriousness of such terrorist acts;

“3. Calls upon all States to:

“(a) Find ways of intensifying and accelerating the exchange of operational
information, especially regarding actions or movements of terrorist persons or
networks; forged or falsified travel documents; traffic in arms, explosives or
sensitive materials; use of communications technologies by terrorist groups; and
the threat posed by the possession of weapons of mass destruction by terrorist
groups;

“(b) Exchange information in accordance with international and domestic law and cooperate on administrative and judicial matters to prevent the commission of terrorist acts;

“(c) Cooperate, particularly through bilateral and multilateral arrangements and agreements, to prevent and suppress terrorist attacks and take action against perpetrators of such acts

“4. Notes with concern the close connection between international terrorism and transnational organized crime, illicit drugs, money-laundering, illegal arms-trafficking, and illegal movement of nuclear, chemical, biological and
other potentially deadly materials, and in this regard emphasizes the need to enhance coordination of efforts on national, subregional, regional and international levels in order to strengthen a global response to this serious
challenge and threat to international security; “5. Declares that acts, methods, and practices of terrorism are contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations and that knowingly financing, planning and inciting terrorist acts are also contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations (excerpts of UNSC Resolution 1373 .

Nowhere in this resolution is there any mention of military action against a UN member State.

The US led war on Afghanistan, using 9/11 as a pretext and a justification is illegal and criminal.

The US and NATO heads of state and heads of government from 2001 to the present are complicit in the launching of a criminal and illegal war.

The Big Lie: Al Qaeda Made in America

Amply documented but rarely mentioned by the mainstream media, Al Qaeda is a creation of the CIA going back to the Soviet- Afghan war. This was a known fact, corroborated by numerous sources including official documents of the US Congress, which the mainstream media chose to either dismiss or ignore. The intelligence community had time and again acknowledged that they had indeed supported Osama bin Laden, but that in the wake of the Cold War: “he turned against us”.

Both the 9/11 Commission Report as well as the Western media have largely upheld the “outside enemy” mythology, heralding Al Qaeda as the “mastermind” organization behind the 9/11 attacks. The official 9/11 narrative has not only distorted the causes underling the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings, it has also erased the historical record of US covert support to international terrorism, while creating the illusion that America and “Western Civilization” are threatened.

Without an “outside enemy”, there could be no “Global War on Terrorism”. The  entire national security agenda would collapse “like a deck of cards”. The war criminals in high office would have no leg to stand on.

After 9/11, the campaign of media disinformation served not only to drown the truth but also to kill much of the historical evidence on how this illusive Al Qaeda “outside enemy” had been fabricated and transformed into “Enemy Number One”.

This is why a legal procedure directed against the actual perpetrators of 9/11 is absolutely essential.

History of Al Qaeda

Important to the understanding of 9/11, US intelligence is the unspoken architect of “Islamic terrorism” going back to the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war.

Bin Laden was 22 years old and was trained in a CIA sponsored guerrilla training camp. Education in Afghanistan in the years preceding the Soviet-Afghan war was largely secular. With religious textbooks produced in Nebraska, the number of CIA sponsored religious schools (madrasahs) increased from 2,500 in 1980 to over 39,000.

“Advertisements, paid for from CIA funds, were placed in newspapers and newsletters around the world offering inducements and motivations to join the [Islamic] Jihad.” 

“The United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings.  The primers, which were filled with talk of jihad and featured drawings of guns, bullets, soldiers and mines, have served since then as the Afghan school system’s core curriculum. Even the Taliban used the American-produced books.”

Under the Reagan administration, US foreign policy evolved towards the unconditional support and endorsement of the Islamic “freedom fighters”. This endorsement has not in any way been modified.

In a twisted irony, throughout the post 911 era, US intelligence in liaison with Britain’s MI6, an Israel’s Mossad, continues to provide covert support to the radical Islamist organization allegedly responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Al Qaeda and its various affiliated groups including the Libya Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) and factions within the Free Syria Army (FSA) are directly supported by the US and NATO.

In a bitter irony, the US and its allies claim to be waging a “war on terrorism” against the alleged architects of 9/11, while also using Al Qaeda operatives as their foot-soldiers.

Iraq: Alleged State Sponsor of the 9/11 Attacks

The formulation of a war of retribution conducted in the name of 9/11 was not limited to Afghanistan.

In the course of 2002, leading up to the invasion of Iraq in March 2003, “Osama bin Laden” and “Weapons of Mass Destruction” statements circulated profusely in the news chain. While Washington’s official position was that
Saddam Hussein was not behind the 9/11 attacks, insinuations abounded both in presidential speeches as well as in the Western media. According to Bush, in an October 2002 press conference:

The threat comes from Iraq. It arises directly from the Iraqi regime’s own actions — its history of aggression, and its drive toward an arsenal of terror.  We also must never forget the most vivid events of recent history. On
September the 11th, 2001, America felt its vulnerability — even to threats that gather on the other side of the earth. We resolved then, and we are resolved today, to confront every threat, from any source [Iraq], that could bring sudden terror and suffering to America. President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat, October
7, 2002)

Barely two weeks before the invasion of Iraq, September 11, 2001 was mentioned abundantly by president Bush. In the weeks leading up to the March invasion, 45 percent of Americans believed Saddam Hussein was “personally involved” in the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. 

Meanwhile, a new terrorist mastermind had emerged: Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi.

In Colin Powell’s historic address to the United Nations Security Council, in February 2003, detailed “documentation” on a sinister relationship between Saddam Hussein and Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi was presented, focussing on his ability to produce deadly chemical, biological and radiological weapons, with the full support and endorsement of the secular Baathist regime. The implication of Colin’s Powell’s assertions, which were totally fabricated, was that Saddam Hussein and an Al Qaeda affiliated organization had joined hands in the production of WMD in Northern Iraq and that the Hussein government was a “state sponsor” of terrorism.

The main thrust of the disinformation campaign continued in the wake of the March 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq. It consisted in presenting the Iraqi resistance movement as “terrorists”. The image of “terrorists opposed to
democracy” fighting US “peacekeepers” appeared on television screens and news tabloids across the globe.

Iran: Condemned by a New York City Court for Supporting Al Qaeda in the 9/11
Attacks

In the wake of the Iraq invasion, the same alleged “state sponsorship” of
terrorism accusations emerged in relation to Iran.

In December 2011, the Islamic Republic of Iran was condemned by a Manhattan
court, for its alleged role in supporting Al Qaeda in the 9/11 attacks.

The investigation into Tehran’s alleged role was launched in 2004, pursuant to a
recommendation of the 9/11 Commission “regarding an apparent link between Iran,
Hezbollah, and the 9/11 hijackers”. The 9/11 Commission’s recommendation was
that this “apparent link” required “further investigation by the U.S.
government.” (9/11 Commission Report , p. 241). (See Iran 911 Case ).

In the December 2011 court judgment (Havlish v. Iran) “U.S. District Judge
George B. Daniels ruled that Iran and Hezbollah materially and directly
supported al Qaeda in the September 11, 2001 attacks and are legally responsible
for damages to hundreds of family members of 9/11 victims who are plaintiffs in
the case”.

According to the plaintiffs attorneys “Iran, Hezbollah, and al Qaeda formed a
terror alliance in the early 1990s. Citing their national security and
intelligence experts, the attorneys explained “how the pragmatic terror leaders
overcame the Sunni-Shi’a divide in order to confront the U.S. (the “Great
Satan”) and Israel (the “Lesser Satan”)”. Iran and Hezbollah allegedly provided
“training to members of al Qaeda in, among other things, the use of explosives
to destroy large buildings.” (See Iran 911 Case ).

This judicial procedure is nothing more than another vicious weapon in the
fabricated “War on Terror” to be used against another Muslim country, with a
view to destabilizing Iran as well as justifying ongoing military threats. It
also says a lot more about the people behind the lawsuit than about the accused.
The expert witnesses who testified against Iran are very active in warmongering
neocon circles. They belong to a web of architects of the 21st century
Middle-Eastern wars, ranging from high profile propagandists to intelligence and
military officers, including former U.S. officials.

But what makes this case absurd is that in September 2011, a few months before
the judgment, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has questioned the
official 9/11 narrative, was accused by Al-Qaeda leaders of “spreading
conspiracy theories about the 9/11 attacks”. The semi-official media outlet of
Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, insisted that al-Qaeda “had been behind the
attacks and criticised the Iranian president for discrediting the terrorist
group.” (See Julie Levesque, Iran Accused of being behind 9/11 Attacks. U.S.
Court Judgment, December 2011 (Havlish v. Iran), Global Research, May 11, 2012)

Al Qaeda: US-NATO Foot-soldiers

Ironically, while Washington accuses Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran of complicity in
the 9/11 attacks, the historical record and evidence indelibly point to the
“state sponsorship” of Al Qaeda by the CIA, MI6 and their intelligence
counterparts in Pakistan, Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

Realities are turned upside down. Al Qaeda death squads have been recruited to
wage America’s humanitarian wars throughout the Middle East an d North Africa.

In Syria Al Qaeda units were recruited by NATO and the Turkish High command:

“Also discussed in Brussels and Ankara, our sources report, is a campaign to
enlist thousands of Muslim volunteers in Middle East countries and the Muslim
world to fight alongside the Syrian rebels.”
(http://www.debka.com/article/21255/ Debkafile, August 31, 2011).

In Libya, jihadists from Afghanistan trained by the CIA were dispatched to fight
with the “pro-democracy” rebels under the helm of “former” Libya Islamic
Fighting Group (LIFG) Commander Abdel Hakim Belhadj:

Western policy makers admit that NATO’s operations in Libya have played the
primary role in emboldening Al Qaeda’s AQIM faction (Al Qaeda in the Islamic
Maghreb). The Fortune 500-funded Brookings Institution’s Bruce Riedel in his
article, “The New Al Qaeda Menace,” admits that AQIM is now heavily armed thanks
to NATO’s intervention in Libya, and that AQIM’s base in Mali, North Africa,
serves as a staging ground for terrorist activities across the region.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/al-qaeda-and-natos-pan-arab-terrorist-blitzkrieg/

“Crimes against Civilization”

9/11 mythology has been the mainstay of war propaganda, which in itself
constitutes a criminal act under international law.

Fiction prevails over reality. For propaganda to be effective, public opinion
must firmly endorse the official 9/11 narrative to the effect that Al Qaeda was
behind the attacks. A well organized structure of media disinformation is
required to reach this objective. Perpetuating the 9/11 Legend also requires
defying as well smearing the 9/11 Truth Movement.

Throughout the post 9/11 era, a panoply of Al Qaeda related events and
circumstances is presented to public opinion on a daily basis. These include
terrorist threats, warnings and attacks, police investigations, insurgencies and
counter-insurgencies, country-level regime change, social conflict, sectarian
violence, racism, religious divisions, Islamic thought, Western values, etc.

Muslims are presented as the perpetrators of the 9/11, thereby unleashing a
Worldwide demonization campaign.

In turn, 9/11, Al Qaeda – War on Terrorism rhetoric permeates political
discourse at all levels of government, including bipartisan debate on Capitol
Hill, in committees of the House and the Senate, at the British House of
Commons, and, lest we forget, at the United Nations Security Council. All these
various bodies are complicit in a criminal project.

September 11 and Al Qaeda concepts, repeated ad nauseam have potentially
traumatic impacts on the human mind and the ability of normal human beings to
analyze and comprehend the “real outside World” of war, politics and the
economic crisis.

What is at stake is human consciousness and comprehension based on concepts and
facts.

With September 11 there are no verifiable “facts” and “concepts”, because 9/11
as well as Al Qaeda have evolved into a media mythology, a legend, an invented
ideological construct, used as an unsubtle tool of war propaganda.

Al Qaeda constitutes a stylized, fake and almost folkloric abstraction of
terrorism, which permeates the inner consciousness of millions of people around
the World.

Reference to Al Qaeda has become a dogma, a belief, which most people espouse
unconditionally. According to the media, “Muslims were behind the attacks”,
thereby justifying a war of retribution against Muslim countries.

Racism and Islamophobia are an integral part of war propaganda.

Is this political indoctrination? Is it brain-washing? If so what is the
underlying objective?

People’s capacity to independently analyse World events, as well as address
causal relationships pertaining to politics and society, is significantly
impaired. That is the objective!

The routine use of 9/11 and Al Qaeda to generate blanket explanations of
complex political events is meant to create confusion.

It prevents people from thinking. It strikes at the core of human values. In a
sense, it destroys civilization.

All of these complex Al Qaeda related occurrences are explained by politicians,
the corporate media, Hollywood and the Washington think tanks under a single
blanket “bad guys” heading, in which Al Qaeda is casually and repeatedly
pinpointed as “the cause” of numerous terror events around the World.

The criminality underlying post 9/11 propaganda is of much broader nature,
affecting people’s mindsets, redefining fundamental social, political and
institutional relations.

“Crimes against Civilization” have been committed.

9/11 mythology precipitates the World into barbarity.

SOURCE:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/september-11-2001-the-crimes-of-war-committed-in-th\
e-name-of-911/5311561

URL:

http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_war_crimes_tribunal/2012/12/michel-chossudovsky\
s-presentation-to-the-911-revisited-conference-in-malaysia.html

CRIMES OF WAR COMMITTED “IN THE NAME OF 9/11: youtube, article by Michel
Chossudovsky

http://worldpeaceassociation.com/wordpress/2013/01/08/crimes-of-war-committed-in\
-the-name-of-911-michel-chossudovsky-initiating-a-legal-procedure-against-the-pe\
rpetrators-of-911-the-tragic-events-of-september-11-2001-consti/

Read more about 911, including review of overwhelming, verifiable evidence
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WorldPeaceAssociation/message/1852

 
FAKE VIDEO FOOTAGE IN US 911 TV COVERAGE  by Eliot Estep

Before I begin, I would just like to say that I mean no disrespect to any of the victims, families, and all those affected by the terrible events of 9/11. My intention has always been to find out the truth about what really happened, how, and, if possible, why. It is one of the most defining days in modern history and many of us remember it as if it were yesterday. I was 12 when it occurred and could not grasp the significance and impact that it would have on my life at the time. More than 5 years later, after watching a 9/11 documentary that raised several valid questions about the legitimacy of the official story, I began to research this event more thoroughly. This spawned my own awakening, as I realized that if the government and media could lie about an event so huge, there were probably many other things that were deliberately falsified and covered up. I still cannot say with certainty what happened that day, but by going through the following evidence, it is important to look at it as a possibility.

While the controlled demolition of the 3 WTC towers has been extensively covered and documented, [1] I would like to bring our attention to the 9/11 media coverage that was shown to us that day and following it. For the overwhelming majority of us, we watched the days events unfold on TV, and our perceptions and beliefs about this event are greatly affected by what we saw that day. More than 11 years later, we have now seen videos of planes hitting the WTC possibly hundreds of times in a highly dramatic and realistic fashion, so our collective belief that planes hit the towers runs deep.

But what if what we saw on TV is not what actually happened? Is it possible that the TV footage was manipulated to make it look like the Twin Towers were hit by planes? Could image-layering, computer-generated imagery, and other professional editing techniques have been employed to create this illusion? What if the towers were really hit by cruise missiles or drone planes instead? While this may sound far-fetched at first, reviewing the footage again for yourself in this pivotal video will reveal to you that this is almost certainly the case.

September Clues is a documentary by video/audio engineer Simon Shack that thoroughly examines the 9/11 television coverage from all major media outlets, including the “amateur footage” released afterwards. Using in-depth comparative analysis of both video and audio of the most pertinent footage, the film conclusively demonstrates that the footage of the planes is not authentic and was actually fabricated. The planes are nothing more than digital superimpositions complete with sound effects and an attempt at “movie-like” realism. The so-called “amateur footage” released afterwards are digital forgeries made by media and video professionals which are supposed to convince us that a real variety of genuine footage exists of this event. This is something that really must be seen and felt for yourself to be truly understood.

“When criminals have unlimited access to instruments of mass persuasion, solid proof of their crimes are hard to expose. On September 11, 2001, almost all pieces of evidence were quickly removed. In fact, all but ONE. It is spread all over America on tapes recorded by American families and verifiable on official TV archives: the 9/11 Television Coverage.” – Simon Shack, creator of September Clues.
Flight175By watching just the first 5-10 minutes (Part A) of this video, you will begin to notice some disturbing trends that continue to present themselves throughout the TV coverage. For example, you will see the infamous “nose in-nose out” shot, where the plane is shown to emerge through the other side of the building with its nose perfectly intact. Immediately after this occurs, the picture is blacked out in an attempt to hide this digital mistake. This was one of the first shots of the second plane hitting the tower from FOX’s Chopper 8, although it was not given virtually any attention afterwards for obvious reasons. All the other live angles are covered, including the coverage shown internationally.

Here are just a few of many disturbing anomalies including:

* In the CNN footage, the news anchors do not even mention seeing a plane after it was first shown quickly crashing into the second tower at 9:03 AM.

* 17 of the “firsthand witnesses” who claimed to see the first and second planes worked directly for news media or are the spouses of media employees. September Clues covers this revealing phenomenon in detail.

* Reporter Don Dahler of ABC reports hearing a missile and “not an airplane”, while Dick Oliver of FOX reports that several witnesses “thought they saw a missile.” They are both quickly corrected by the news anchors and this idea is never given airtime again.

* The vast majority of civilian witnesses report seeing a “small plane” and there does not seem to be any kind of consensus as to what type, size, or color it actually was.

* Depending on the footage, different flight paths are shown, which is highly contradictory. One angle shows the plane dive-bombing into the tower, which is an impossible maneuver for a Boeing 767 that is claimed to have been approaching at 590 MPH near sea level.

* There appears to be a 17-second delay between the actual attacks and the screening of the footage, and all major news networks had some kind of audible “trigger” which occurred precisely 17 seconds before the explosions in the second tower occurred.

* The audio is faked and varies widely depending on which clip you see, particularly in the “amateur footage.” For example, one sample of a woman screaming is found both on the amateur film and TV coverage in an identical match.

* Several “slips of the tongue” occur regarding missiles throughout the day and later on: from CNN anchor Vince Cellini, Donald Rumsfeld, and 9/11 Commission member Tim Roemer, who mentions a missile hitting the Pentagon before quickly correcting himself.

* Many more technical issues regarding the footage, including the backgrounds used actually being digital composites, as well as the use of actors to provide false testimonials about “what they saw” following the event.

agmmissile

The usage of missiles on 9/11 is actually not such a hard phenomenon to comprehend. Shack believes JASSM AGM-158 cruise missiles could have been used, which look eerily like a plane indeed. [2] Logically, it makes far more sense than the official story of 19 Arab hijackers being able to foil the most advanced air defence systems on the planet — 4 times in one day. It would be much more feasible to simulate or falsify the appearance of planes crashing into the towers digitally than actually having it happen. After all, why do we believe that planes hit the towers in the first place? Because we saw them on TV or on some kind of digital medium at some point, over and over again until it sank in as being real. It is quite possibly the biggest lie and psychological warfare operation in modern human history, being a truly collective event that has had such a profound impact on the direction we have taken globally over the last decade.

Regarding the Pentagon, it is well known that a Boeing 767 cannot fit into a 16-foot wide hole that pierced through all five layers of the building. The hole is nowhere near big enough and there are no plane pieces near the crash site. Even CNN’s initial reporter on the scene Jamie McIntyre states (at 18:36) that there is “no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.” Therefore, it is much more plausible and likely that a missile was used in this case, and most likely with the Twin Towers as well. Of course, the government later claimed to have identified all the bodies of the victims on these non-existent planes. This alone raises massive implications about the simulation of victim deaths which must be considered. The wreckage in Shanksville, PA is similar, with nothing more than a large crater in the ground with not a single piece of plane debris in sight. Again, all the victims were “confirmed and identified.” Are we really expected to believe that planes crashed here? This defies all logic and physics.

While it may be hard to accept at first, it is almost certain that no commercial airplanes were involved in the attacks of 9/11. The “highly-realistic” image we have of a plane crashing into the towers is nothing more than cartoon physics when you really look at it. The clear absence of a plane can be seen in this short unedited video clip that gives you an idea of what really happened.

HEZ15It is difficult to accept because many of us cannot fathom the implication that specific elements of the media and government would actually go to such lengths to stage an operation like this. My response to that is that they can and they will continue to. By studying the underlying agenda of the power elite and those who manage societies, 9/11 was most certainly a pivotal event to advance their agenda and vastly expedite their processes of increasing wars and restricting liberties across the globe. It is likely that the operation itself was highly compartmentalized, where everyone participating was informed strictly in a “need-to-know” capacity only. It is probable that only as many people as needed were used (my guess is less than 100), with the threats and reinforcements of murder, bribery, blackmail, and coercion being implemented to ensure silence among those who really know what happened.

Untold amounts of death, misery, and suffering continues to occur worldwide as a direct result of the 9/11 attacks. Therefore, it is imperative that we remember that the main weapon used on that day was the *television* — not the fanatical acts of 19 Arab hijackers (many of whom are still reportedly alive). [3] All it takes to simulate and falsify the plane crashing into the building is some video-editing skills. Watch how easily it can be done.

This is the real 9/11 truth. What the vast majority of all 9/11 truth documentaries and researchers don’t cover is the television fakery that was used to sell this version of events to the world. In fact, it is likely that some of the most popular 9/11 documentaries like Loose Change are actually covertly-funded controlled opposition [4] that deliberately spread the false idea that planes hit the towers, meanwhile covering other anomalies such as the Pentagon missile and controlled demolition of the three buildings with seeming veracity. Several of these groups have actually banned the discussion of “no-plane theories” outright, refusing to even consider that media fakery has been used in any way. This is highly revealing of the integrity of some of the influential figures and leaders in the “truth movements,” which often have underlying agendas that are not so readily perceivable upon first glance.

It is not widely known that the use of all electronics was severely disrupted in New York City on the morning of 9/11. Many clocks in the city stopped working precisely at 8:45AM. Cell phones, video cameras, NYFD firefighter radios, the WTC internal communication system, and the Port Authority’s equipment were all either malfunctioning or blacked out entirely. [5] The possibility of directed EMP/HERF energy currents being used as a means to maintain total visual control of the scene must be considered in this case. This would be done to ensure that genuine footage of what actually happened to the towers is minimized or prevented entirely from emerging publicly.

FLIPapostol_faustino_smallFLIPcirri_robert_small

Another highly disturbing trend that Shack has uncovered in his research involves the photo forgery regarding the 9/11 victims. By visiting the official 9/11 memorial websites, it has been shown that a large amount of victims have had their photos duplicated and edited to appear as distinctly unique images. [6] The reason for these digital forgeries is unknown but reveals the possibility that computer-assisted false identities may have been used to simulate some of the victim deaths. Additionally, there are huge discrepancies in the death tolls among the memorials, ranging in a difference of several hundred people. This raises the important implication that 3000 people may not have actually been killed on 9/11, whereas the actual number is most likely far, far less. Please watch the following video to see this for yourself.

Potential Fake Photos of Victims – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoZEuj1VPv0

I am almost certain that if we were shown the 9/11 TV coverage again today as it was played out in 2001 on live TV, we would have no doubt that those planes were faked. Back then, we were not used to such widespread exposure to highly dramatic and ultra-realistic footage that is so common now in movies and TV shows. Our perceptions have now changed drastically, but the majority of us still believe that planes hit the towers. I encourage you to watch September Clues or to visit the official 9/11 TV archive [7] and verify this critical issue for yourself.

If fabricated television and video footage can fool almost the entire world, then what else are we being lied to about? This is something worth considering as we continue to awaken and perceive major world events with more clarity and objectivity than ever before. While it is not known exactly what transpired on 9/11, the truth about what did NOT happen is becoming clearer and clearer by the day. We must understand that television is still being used as a weapon of mass distraction to keep us thinking and conforming within acceptable bounds of consciousness. It’s time to turn it off and to reclaim our minds and critical thinking capacities to their fullest extent!

As we continue to empower ourselves with our own ever-evolving truths and understandings about the world, keeping an open and discerning mind when confronted with new and challenging information remains vital. When we see things for what they really are, we can begin to detach from all the drama and get back to the root issues at hand, such as the knowing that peace and a sustainable paradigm are not possible when war is used as a means to “solve conflicts.” Only by addressing our most pressing issues at their core can we begin to see tangible, positive change finally emerge on a personal, communal, and global scale.

For more information, I highly recommend a visit to SeptemberClues.info to read important articles about what may have really happened on 9/11, including:

* Deconstructing 9/11

* Who Did 9/11?

* The Memorial Scams

* Obstacles to the Truth

* FAQ: what about the planes and passengers?

* FAQ: The eyewitnesses?

* FAQ: All the other video footage?

Thank you for reading this far and for giving this important issue your consideration. I believe it to be vital in our collective awakening process. May all the victims and those affected by this tragic event be forever blessed and remembered. Your service to humanity and all of life will not be forgotten! May the truth be revealed for all to know and see.

Sincerely and with love,
Eliot

**********

Update regarding the planes and passengers:
To explain what has happened to the planes and the passengers, research and investigation has been conducted using the available and relevant official data. However, the results are not what you may think. There are no records of AA Flights 11 and 77 ever existing. As of 2005, United Flight 93 and 175 were both still listed as valid and operational aircraft in the FAA registry. Therefore, it is far more likely that many of the ‘victims’ themselves never existed, with their deaths most certainly being simulated primarily through digital means. While it is hard to swallow at first, please keep an open mind when reading these responses and articles. The bottom line is that we’re all after the truth here, no matter how ugly or unbelievable it may appear at first.

I will cite Simon Shack’s answers to these questions, for his research far outweighs mine in this area:

“ALLEGED FLIGHTS

The 4 purported hijacked flights have grave problems as far as their authenticity is concerned: A long list of documentation (or plain lack of it) reveals inconsistent NTSB, BTS and FAA data. The 2 American Airlines flights lacked records of required airport log data such as taxi-off and wheels-off times. The 2 United Airlines flights were not deregistered until October 2005, as of official FAA records. Both should have been listed, by law, as ‘destroyed’. Shortly thereafter, the FAA rectified this ‘oversight’ in a peculiar manner : in place of ‘destroyed’, the wording used was ‘cancelled’. This evidence has not been challenged, to this day, by any of those air-regulating agencies nor by the airlines themselves.

ALLEGED PASSENGERS

Since no evidence has been forthcoming of the very existence of the 4 ‘hijacked’ airplanes, the question of the passengers allegedly on board of them should be moot. However, multiple and repeated people-searches have attempted to backtrack and contact the alleged families of those passengers – to no avail. Thus, the prevailing indications of those longstanding investigations suggest that none of these people have ever existed. Moreover, the stories created around the alleged passengers simply do not stand up to scrutiny. As for the cell phone calls that they allegedly placed to their loved ones, they have by now been established as a technical impossibility.”

See these other very revealing articles on the usage of fake planes and passengers:

Exchange of letters between Elias Davidsson and American Airlines –http://www.aldeilis.net/english/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2329&Itemid=107

Participants in the Cover-Up of 9/11: The Case of American and United Airlines – by Elias Davidsson –http://www.septemberclues.info/case_of_airlines.htm

Evidence that Flights AA 11 and AA 77 Did Not Exist on September 11, 2001 – by Peter Meyer –http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa_flts/aa_flts.htm

An Interview with Gerard Holmgren – by David West, June 27, 2005 –http://www.serendipity.li/wot/holmgren_interview.htm

************************

Sources:

[1] Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth – http://www.ae911truth.org/en/evidence.html

[2] AGM-158 JASSM Cruise Missile – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJi2K8mKTRM

[3] “Hijack ‘suspects’ alive and well” – BBC News, September 23, 2001 – http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm

[4] “Loose Change: The Financiers/Webmasters Exposed” – http://www.septemberclues.info/loose_change.htm

[5] “Visual Control of 9/11” – http://septemberclues.info/visual_control.htm

[6] “The 9/11 Memorial Scams” – http://septemberclues.info/vicsims_photo-analyses.htm

[7] September 11 Television Archive – http://archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive

[8] 9-11 Truth is Limited Hangout – ‘September Clues’ – http://www.henrymakow.com/september_clues.html

Eliot Estep: We are all divine beings of love at our core! I AM a genuine truth-seeker dedicated to living a life of joy, peace, and abundance. I value integrity, freedom, and creative self-expression above all. It is a privilege to be here during this time of great change. Let us prepare. Main areas of research: conspiracies, global affairs, extraterrestrials, spiritual advancement + Sun: ♏ + Moon: ♎

emelberg .

Comments:
…”Just before the announcement at 9 am, Bush Sr. ordered the demolition of the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers to stop the international banking computers on Floors 1and 2 in the North Tower from initiating the new U.S. Treasury Bank system.
Kirk Hemelberg .

…” to cover-up their crime”?

9-11 WTC Biggest Gold Heist in History: $300 Billion in Bars
“Loose Change” documents “False Flag” 9-11 attack on America

Kirk Hemelberg http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded…#!

Dan Shellenbarger Know how long it take to prep a building for demolition? 13 hrs

Dan Shellenbarger look at the credit card recits for nyc befor 911,, you will find the demolition expers right there in town,, there you go case closed.

SNOWDEN, HERO OF TRUTH, GRANTED ASYLUM IN VENEZUELA; HE COULD UNRAVEL U.S. LIES-Web Radio, Articles, Cartoons

snowden102way_sq-e640efc5481e6a88137c4aa402822717bc5c48b2-s6-c30

Listen to internet radio with Aquarian Radio on BlogTalkRadio

1  1  1 Snowden

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edward Snowden has opened up the possibility of, finally, truth in our government’s secret spying.  More revelations, according to Dr. Sasha Lessin, will inevitably lead to the truth of the role of the world-wide power elite.  Snowden’s leaks reveal the U.S. government’s lies about UFOs and the continuous ET presence on Earth, as well as the US off-budget governmet’s knowledge of free energy, its planned complicity and stand-down in the Twin Towers and Oklahoma bombings designed to scare Americans into allowing the so-called Patriot Act which let the government think it’s legitimating its snooping and murders, curtail what’s left of our ostensible civil liberties, kill Middle Easterners, steal the documents and artifacts hidden in Iraq that reveal our ET ancestry and diss Christianity, Islam and Judaism.

Venezuelan Asylum Offerred, Snowden reveals UFO Documents

BY KILGOAR in the Internet Chronicle

According to bombshell documents leaked by Snowden, the government has long known UFOs to be a species more advanced than mankind.

CARACAS, Venezuela – Edward Snowden, the leaker of NSA surveillance documents, was granted asylum in Venezuela on Friday. With safe harbors in sight, Snowden was willing to share shocking and world-shattering exclusive secret government documents with The Internet Chronicle.
Snowden2

Snowden 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

..

.

.

.

 

.

.

.

.

Snowden’s testimony was as follows:

“The highest levels of government don’t know what to do about UFOs, and the official story that they are all merely weather balloons or natural phenomena have been clearly dismissed. If anything, these documents speak about UFOs as if they are surely guided by an intelligence beyond our own. As it turns out, the most credible and inexplicable sightings are of vehicles that have been spotted leaving the sea floor at hydrothermal vents and directly entering solar orbit . . .

“Because ballistic missile tracking systems and deep-sea sonar are kept as state secrets, scientists don’t have access to data about these objects. However, most of the contractors at DARPA are sure that there is a species more intelligent than homo sapiens living in the mantle of the Earth. It makes sense, if you think about it, because that is the only place where conditions have been more or less stable for billions of years. Extremophiles may live at different temperatures than us, but they have been able to thrive and develop intelligence at a seemingly accelerated rate. That’s not true, because they’ve simply evolved at the same rate, but without many of the vicissitudes which set back surface life . . .

“The president receives daily briefings about their activities. Analysts believe their technology to be so far advanced that we stand little chance of survival in any potential war. The general sentiment is that we are but ants from their perspective, so there is little chance they would empathize or attempt to communicate with us, and the current contingency plan is to detonate nuclear weapons in deep caverns to ‘sting’ the foe we have no hope of destroying in hopes it would discourage further attacks.”

Critics may allege that what the 30-year-old former NSA and CIA contractor can state with authority about our ultraterrestrial neighbors is already well-known. But the Ground-Penetrating Radar, or GPR, scans, which The Internet Chronicle has shared and confirmed with sources within intelligence community, will only serve to underscore popular bitterness over strategically timed earthquakes and tsunamis.

Just as PRISM shined a new light on goings-on in NSA’s ECHELON computer systems, revealed in the 1990s, the vast complexes of underground cities – laser-etched from pure diamond – apparent in the GPR scans will transform public debate about the balance between liberty and security.
Snowden 8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From UFO Digest

If we study carefully the events that lead to the Watergate style leakof NSA snooping recently, we can observe some hopeful signs as to an end to the UFO/ET cover-up. A small community of people has known about the massive surveillance of global citizens by the NSA for a long time, with a steady drip of whistleblowers coming forward on a regular basis. It’s not really that dissimilar to the drip of whistleblower leaks in the UFO community. It is possible that we have laid the groundwork for one courageous whistleblower, or small group of whistleblowers and media, to bring UFO/ET disclosure to the general public as has happened with the leak by Edward Snowden.
Snowden 7

It would be well that we paid attention to national and internationalevents that are unraveling the web of elite control, secrecy and deception worldwide. We just had unprecedented attention given to the latest Bilderberg meeting this June with some mainstream media attention. Attention has been growing slowly, drip by drip, focusing on Bilderberg activities since the group’s formation. Whistleblowers and alternative media seem to have reached a critical mass, and now seem to have put the super-secret group into disarray over transparency, as some of those on the uninformed periphery of the group, lobby for openness against the core fascists.

Snowden3

Another factor also in play is that many world governments are beginning to declassify UFO/ET documents in large numbers, while the United States Government continues to lie to the public on the issue. Even the Russians have been more open as to extraterrestrial contact with even the President of Russia coming forward that he received a briefing on ETs among us along with the nuclear codes when he became President. It was treated as a joke by the American press when he referred to the Russiandocumentary on the Men in Black when the American press thought he was talking about the American comedy Men in Black.

Snowden5

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

So we should ask ourselves is the stage now being set for one or several very courageous individuals to come forward with a major leak on MJ 12 or NSA data on extraterrestrials. Could this happen in the same manner that the leak by Edward Snowden has stimulated open public debate on NSA eavesdropping on global citizens? I certainly hope that this same sort of thing happens to stimulate aninternational public discussion on UFO/ET like is already going on in the limited arena of the UFO/ET community.

I have thought for the past several years that the only way we are going to get real unequivocal UFO/ET disclosure is for the Bilderberg Criminal Mafia’s global control structure to weaken. It’s got to weaken enough to where the information falls out into the public domain through whistleblower leaks that can’t be stopped. I don’t think governments will willingly disclose when the UFO cover-up is the global elite’s meal ticket with trillions of dollars being made by secretly exploiting ET technology and suppression of free energy technologies.

Snowden4

 

.

.

.

Obama Gives Himself Control of all Communication Systems in America

Forward from http://worldtruth.tv

US President Barack Obama quietly signed his name to an Executive Order on Friday, allowing the White House to control all private communications in the country in the name of national security.President Obama released his latest Executive Order on Friday, July 6, a 2,205-word statement offered as the “Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions.” And although the president chose not to commemorate the signing with much fanfare, the powers he provides to himself and the federal government under the latest order are among the most far-reaching yet of any of his executive decisions.

On the government’s official website for the National Communications Systems, the government explains that that“infrastructure includes wireline, wireless, satellite, cable, and broadcasting, and provides the transport networks that support the Internet and other key information systems,” suggesting that the president has indeed effectively just allowed himself to control the country’s Internet access.

In order to allow the White House to reach anyone within the US, the president has put forth a plan to establish a high-level committee calling from agents with the Department of Homeland Security, Pentagon, Federal Communications Commission and other government divisions to ensure that his new executive order can be implemented.

In explaining the order, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) writes that the president has authorized the DHS “the authority to seize private facilities when necessary, effectively shutting down or limiting civilian communications.”

In Section 5 of his order, President Obama outlines the specific department and agency responsibilities that will see through his demands. In a few paragraphs, President Obama explains that Executive Committee that will oversee his order must be supplied with “the technical support necessary to develop and maintain plans adequate to provide for the security and protection of NS/EP communications,” and that that same body will be in tasked with dispatching that communiqué “to the Federal Government and State, local, territorial and trial governments,” by means of“commercial, Government and privately owned communications resources.”

Later, the president announces that the Department of Homeland Security will be tasked with drafting a plan during the next 60 days to explain how the DHS will command the government’s Emergency Telecommunications Service, as well as other telecom conduits. In order to be able to spread the White House’s message across the country, President Obama also asks for the purchasing of equipment and services that will enable such.

LBJ ORDERED JFK KILLED, VALIANT THOR TOLD RFK: Web Radio Interview with Robert Potter

Sacred Matrix with Sasha and Janet Lessin 2013 05 30

Kennedy loves a parade

JFK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert Potter, interviewed by Janet Kira and Dr. Sasha Lessin, relates how his ET mentor, Valiant Thor, Commander of the Venutian Fleet around Earth, landed in Alexandria, Virginia and was brought to the White House where he shook hands with Ike and Nixon before spending 5 years in the Pentagon.

ValientThorHis#2FrankStranges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From left to right is Thor’s #2, like Thor, from Venus, in the middle, Dr. Frank Stranges, far right person is Commander  Valiant Thor of Venus who met Eisenhower.

JOHNSON SWORN

 

 

Murderer sworn in as Jackie, who despised him, bit her tongue.

 

 

 

After JFK  was shot, Thor told Robert Kennedy that he had direct evidence that Lyndon  Johnson, about to be impeached for the Bobby Baker scandal, had President Kennedy killed when Kennedy bipassed the Federal Reserve and ordered the U.S. Mint to print it’s own money.  

Potter reveals the details of the RFK’s meeting with Thor.  

Thor’s flagship nests, says Potter, beneath Lake Mead.

Potter says Thor and his fleet stand ready to assist us soon in the EVENT–mass arrests of the power and media elite.

Click the link below and hear the mind-blowing revelations of lifelong contactee Potter.
Sa

Illuminati Mass Murders Humanity Every Day by Janet Kira Lessin

Peace3IlluminatiIsGood_imagesIlluminati Mass Murders (and Mind Controls) Humanity Every Day by Janet Kira Lessin

How many people do you know have died consciously, by choice? How many were completely healthy, woke up and said, “Today is a good day to die” and somewhere in the course of that day of death declaration, laid down, died and exited their bodies by pure will?

Approximately 155,000 die worldwide every single day. More than that are born, granted. But 155,000 leave this planet not by choice, but because they’re being murdered by this system of disease and accidents, most of which are caused because this system is fundamentally flawed, purposely created by the power elite. They systematically reduce our numbers because we’re no longer useful to them. But if diseases, and that includes the disease of aging, were eliminated, half that number would remain, perhaps more.

The rest perish from accidents, like traffic accidents. Many of those could be eliminated if we had other systems of transport, like teleportation (which already exists) in place. Some would still die every day. But that number would be minuscule in comparison to the 155,000 who die daily as of the writing of this article in May, 2013.

Healthier systems, less toxic and dangerous which come from technologies still being hidden and denied our planetary population, would eliminate even more deaths.

What would we do with our numbers? We’d colonize other worlds, of course. Or we may operate differently if we lived hundreds of thousands of years and only reproduce when we wanted to rather than by some subconscious desires to duplicate quickly before its too late and before we’re ready.

Most parents are ill equipped to parent, thus causing multi-generational dysfunction which leads to extreme negative emotional responses, such as depression and addiction to drugs (both prescribed and illegal). It’s a formula for death for many. And those who die through suicide are collateral damage for the Illuminati created by unloving and unsupportive societal systems that could easily meet the needs of its members and eliminate most if not all suicides. Now wouldn’t that be something?

What can we do? What can I do?

First of all, educate yourself to what’s happening behind the scenes. Investigate. Insist on transparency and honesty in your world. Start with yourself. Practice what you preach and desire. Pay attention to your needs, wants and desires. Do they serve you and your loved ones, friends, community? Get involved. Participate. Run for office. Learn how to feel one another, communicate and address their needs. Treat them as you would your own. Love thy neighbor as thyself.

Clear any health issues and addictions within self. Get therapy. Get healthy on all levels, mind, body and soul. As you clear your subconscious and Higher Self, awareness aligns with your consciousness, balances your soul, ego and psyche. You become aligned, conscious, centered, an Aware Ego. You’re clear, understanding the game of existence and who you truly are with healthy boundaries for yourself while simultaneously holding into consideration your needs, wants and desires and the needs, wants and desires of your brothers, sisters, global community with whom you are all one at your core.

United, we stand, meaning we all benefit. There’s a point where all’s consensus, all are happy and healthy. None benefit at the suffering of others. Seek that alignment with all humanity, all creation within self. Then reach one, teach one, starting with those who are in your life, with whom you feel most intimate. You are a lifeline, a healthy channel of divine love, light and information designed to clear and heal all conflict and create a world and system of worlds where souls come to love and play, each day’s a joy with just enough challenge and interplay to make it interesting.

There will always be new frontiers for the Universe is vast. Explore and assist other worlds if one that’s healed, calm and cool becomes too boring for you. Once this Universe is complete, others will open for existence too is far too vast for any one being to ever fully comprehend.

Begin with self. Reach out to those in your arena. Eventually you’ll encounter those employed in the mass killing machine. It’s inevitable. Perhaps you yourself are already employed in the process that kills. I’m sure you are or have been in some part of your life (if you’re older) or may be involved in the future if you don’t watch your step.

As an employee, be aware of the products and policies of those with whom you seek employment. Boycott those places which have practices that you abhor. Maybe you’re not even aware. That takes us back to the beginning of this essay. Educate yourself. But if you can’t do it all at once, because it’s really not very easy to boycott the only store in your neighborhood because you’ll actually end up supporting the oil industry by driving further to shop where the store’s policies more closely align with your new found new age policies of love that supports the whole rather than the few at the top.

But give yourself time. Over time you’ll get it and figure out ways to shift your reality, then the totality of the continuum to more conscious relating and interacting across the board. In the meanwhile, do your best. Breathe. Relax into it. Have fun now and again. Forgive yourself. Forgive them all. This is a system of lies and deception. We’ve all been duped. Yet by finding love within your heart, forgiveness of self and others, you’ll be gently guided by higher love and dimensions of awareness.

You’ll meet then defeat Pharoah (and all his incarnations such as Kings, Queens, Popes, Priests, CEOs, Presidents, Prime Ministers, etc.) by melting his heart. Love will gradually transform all and the sooner you align with love, the faster it happens for all. It’s the Hundredth Monkey, Morphogenic Field, domino affect. In a twinkling of an eye, all transforms and love becomes the new operating system, the paradigm for our world, our beloved Mother Earth and all her peoples, beings, creatures and features. Peace rules divine love incarnated continually into third dimensional physicality till all aligns with heaven at the highest levels of existence. We’re done. ONE.

Then we start over. Isn’t it grand?

ANCIENT ANTHROPOLOGY REVISED: Internet Radio, Article by Sasha Lessin, Ph.D. and Illustrations

 

Inanna & Sargon Conquer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click arrow to listen

The giant gods of the ancient world and the successors they choose created mind-sets that shackle us to short desperate lives.  These so-called gods rocketed to Earth from a planet they called Nibiru.  Nibirans stand way taller—8-12 feet tall and live way longer—hundreds of thousands years– than we. These ETs from Nibiru said they bred us as short term slaves and soldiers.  We killed in their names: Allah (= Sumerian, Marduk or Nannar), Yahweh (sometimes = Enlil, at times Adad or even Enki), Ishtar (Inanna)–mining expedition personnel all, all Nibirans.  We Earthlings are one species, designed to serve in mines, armies, businesses, schools, governments, farms, factories, and building projects for ETs and the “royal” lines of ever-murderous hybrid rulers they begat.

The alternative history Zecharia Sitchin, Neal Freer, Lloyd  Pye, Michael Tellinger, Andy Lloyd, Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson articulate about our origins and development shatter the fetters of the lies with the false gods and their hybrid elite keep us in war, greed, poverty, short lives.  Lies of church and state  hide hoard information, necessities and survival plans as Earth faces dangers from space.

We’ll survive when we acknowledge our kinship with all Earth’s people.  We all descended from the same ancestors, ancestors from two different planets.  Accept our hybrid origins and nullify rule of the elite the Nibirans imposed on us.  Instead, cooperate with all people.  Drop the god-scripted hate for others.  We survive together when we jointly plan for the periodic return of Nibiru, its astronauts, and the debris that lurks at its Lagrange point, 180 degrees from Nibiru on its orbit around its subdwarf primary star, Nemesis.

When I studied for my doctorate in anthropology at U.C.L.A. in the 60s, my professors,doing the best they could with the data they had then, taught that gradual physical then socio-cultural evolution caused all human development.

The physical anthropologists at UCLA said a Miocene or Pliocene anthropoid primate evolved into a hominid, Homo Erectus, which in turn had evolved from simpler primates over millions of years. My anthropology teachers said Homo Sapiens–that’s us–gradually evolved from Homo Erectus [Clark, D., W., 1959, History of the Primates:178].

The sociocultural anthropologists said we evolved with technology we ourselves developed.  W we proliferated, they thought, as we planted and bred cereals from local grains, tamed indigenous wild sheep, goats, cattle, donkeys and horses, invented tools and machines, developed medicine, constructed irrigation and transportation systems, built cities and developed ever-more effective mathematics, astronomy, chemistry, metallurgy, architecture and engineering.

Modern information proves the anthropologists wrong about our physical evolution.  We didn’t evolve incrementally from simpler primates on Earth.  We’ve found no gradually intermediate skeletons of primates that link modern humans from tarsier-like ancestors from which Twentieth Century anthropologists thought we evolved.  Several advanced homininoids co-existed with Erectus. Erectus and its contemporaries may have been survivors of astronomically-caused extinction events during human settlement on Earth long before 400,000 years ago when the scientist Enki and crews of seven – twelve foot tall Homo Sapiens colonized Earth from Nibiru. Or, as Pye asserts, Erectus and all the hominoids on Earth may have been placed on Earth be terraformers, and thes hominoids, some of whose genes we carry, may still roam the hinterlands of our civilization as the Sasquash, or modern Neanderthal.  Reject the view that we’re entirely indigenous and evolved only from simpler forms native to this planet.

Reject also anthropologists’ old view that the technologies we invented caused our social evolution.  Accept instead the overwhelming evidence this book summarizes, evidence that we developed socially when the ETs from Nibiru gave us advanced technologies.  60s anthropologists had noted mysterious uplevelings of civilizations every 3,600 years or so when Nibiru neared Earth, improvements ancient inhabitants of Iraq–then called Sumer–wrote that the Nibiran gods gave them.  Anthropologists of the 60s believed these gods imaginary.

My Chairman at U.C.L.A. said technological innovations Sumerians themselves developed explained social evolution.  Their innovations, he said, allowed more population growth, sedentariness, material goods, specialization and leisure, all of which caused social evolution.  Neither he nor I ever considered the “gods” as real–let alone the source of cultural evolution. The Sumerians wrote that the  “gods” gave them the genes, inventions, crops and livestock that let them increase their numbers and master the environment.  In the thrall of evolutionary anti-creationism, we dismissed what Mesopotamians, Egyptians, Indians, Norse, Chinese, Tibetan, Central and South Americans said about gods who rode Celestial Chariots, threw thunderbolts and periodically boosted our civilizations with crops, herds, devices, laws and knowledge. [Goldschmidt, W., 1959, Man’s Way: 110 -117]

Sociologist C. W. Mills showed how power elites control Earth and collaborate to perpetuate competition and war.  These elites descended from the bloodline of Enki whom Sumerians said was a god, albeit a flesh-and blood god.  300,000 years ago, Enki engineered his genes with those of Neanderthal or Erectus to breed goldmining slaves.

13,000 years ago, Enki fathered Ziasudra (Noah in The Bible), ancestor of the elite that to this day rule Earth.  The elite still employ a master-slave, god-worshiper code (with them in master status and we in slave–albeit economic slave–status) to run humanity.  Ziasudra’s descendants–today’s elite–passed their mandate to dictate “from Sumer through Egypt to Israel through David and the messiahs, fostered by the Essene communities in Canaan.

“Jesus was an Essene as was his wife, Mary Magdalene, information the Catholic Church suppressed.  Catholics instead perpetuated slave-code fear and subservience.  They hid the truth of our hybridization and persecuted and brutalized the human-centered strain of the bloodline [that’s most of us].” [Gardiner, L., 2000, Bloodline of the Holy Grail; quote from Freer, 2004, Sapiens Rising]

In 2000, Cody and Robin Johnson brought me to a seminar led by Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin.  Sitchin displayed evidence in clay and stone of astronomical, geological and biological knowledge Sumerians said gods gave them, knowledge our scientists only verified many millenia later.  Sitchin disproved both the theistic creationism and academic evolutionary dogma the elite perpetrated.  He solved the mysteries of missing hominid links and the periodic leaps in our social and industrial evolution.  No missing physical links existed because we emerged suddenly, when Enki and his cohorts blended their genome and Erectus’.  We got stronger tools and weapons when a Sumerian “god” showed the Hittites how to mine and refine iron.
SitchinPoster

 

 

 

Sitchin’s work breaks the elite’s stranglehold on us.  I attended Sitchin seminars and read everything he, Tellinger, Lloyd, Pye, Cremo and other revisionists wrote. Thanks to these revisionists, we can revise our dismissal of  “myths” as superstition.  Sumerians labeled Nibirans’ aircraft, submarines, helicopters, spaceships, weapons and computers with their own metaphors or words the Nibirans taught them as skyships, celestial chariots, arks, whirlbirds, brilliances, and MEs.  Sumerian scribes recorded the history and science the Nibirans taught them.  We can now evaluate what these ETs said and not dismiss tales of gods as superstitious myth.

“Sitchin advanced a coherent paradigm of our genesis to rewrite our beginnings and astronomically, evolutionarily, paleontologically, archaeologically and redefine ourselves.  His thesis corrects creationism, redefines Darwinism. Sitchin read Sumerian as well as Hebrew, was steeped in the history and had material from the Middle East rediscovered only last one hundred and fifty years.” [Freer, N., 2004, Sapiens Arising]

In our book, Anunnaki: Gods No More, wife Janet and I review our ancient history and sense of who we are, how we got here, and how the new paradigm of Earthlings’ unique two-race genetics frees us from the model the ETs imposed on us.   The new view frees us the physical and economic slavery, hierarchic obsession, derogation of women, gold lust, antagonistic religions and nations the Nibirans and the hybrid elite they created dictated.

Free of short, desperate lives, we’ll create our future.  We shall activate our latent Anunnaki genes, scientifically improve our own genome and take our place in the civilization of the galaxy.

References

Bramley, W..
1989, The Gods of Eden, Avon

Clark, D., W., 1959, History of the Primates, Phoenix

Childe, G.,
1960, What Happened in History, Pelican

Cremo, M. and Thompson, R.,
1993, Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race, Torchlight

Cremo, M.,
2003, Human Devolution: A Vedic Alternative to Darwin’s Theory, Torchlight
2001, Forbidden Archeology’s Impact, Torchlight

Diamond, J.,
2011, Collapse, Penguin

Doreal, M.,
2002, The Emerald Tablets of Thoth-The-Atlantian, Source Books

Ferguson, V.
1995, Inanna Returns, Thel Dar

Freer, N.,
1999, God Games, Book Tree
2000, Breaking the Godspell, Book Tree
2004, Sapiens Rising: Beyond the Babel Factor, www.neilfreer.com

Gardiner, L.,
2000, Bloodline of the Holy Grail, Fair Winds

Goldschmidt, W.,
1959, Man’s Way: 110 -117

Goodman, M.,
2008, Rome and Jerusalem, Vintage

Hapgood, C.,
1997, Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings, Adventures Unlimited

Hauck, D.,
1999, The Emerald Tablet, Penguin

Hazelton, L.,
2007, Jezebel, Doubleday

Hoagland, R. & Bara, M.,
2007, Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA,

Holland, T.,
2005, Persian Fire, Anchor

Kramer, S.,
1971, The Sumerians, University of Chicago

Lessin, S. and J.,
2013,Anunnaki, Gods No More, Createspace 2000,

Lessin, S.,
2000, www.enkispeaks.com/wordpress
2011, “ETs from Planet Nibiru”, UFOs and Supernatural Magazine, Vol 1:2
2011,“A Chat with Dr. Sasha Lessin”, UFOs and Supernatural Magazine, Vol 1:2
2011,“Extraterrestrials Engineered Our Species” UFOs and Supernatural Magazine, Issue 4
2011,“ The Anunnaki’s Great Deluge: The True and Original Story” UFOs and Supernatural Magazine, Feb-March Issue

Marrs, J.,
1998, Alien Agenda, Harper Paperbacks
2000, Rule By Secrecy (Part V, Ancient Mysteries), Perennial

Mitchell, S.,
2004, Gilgamesh, Free Press

Schultz, D.,
2008, The Earth Chronicles Time Chart, galactic2.net/KJOL/CCCA/timechart.html

Sereda, D.,
2012, Breakthrough: Faster Than Light Communication with ET, Open Minds

Sitchin, J.,
2011, Zecharia Sitchin Official Website [Website in citations]

Sitchin, Z. [ZS in text attributions]
1976, The 12th Planet, Avon
1983, The Stairway to Heaven [Stairway], Avon
1985, The Wars of Gods and Men [Wars], Avon
1990, Genesis Revisited Avon
1990, The Lost Realms Avon
1993, When Time Began [Time], Avon
1995, Divine Encounters [Encounters], Avon
1996, Of Heaven and Earth, Book Tree
1998 The Cosmic Code, Avon
2002, The Lost Book of Enki [Enki], Bear
2004, The Earth Chronicles Expeditions [Expeditions], Bear
2007, The End of Days, HarperCollins
2007, Journeys to the Mythical Past  [Journeys]’, Bear
2009 The Earth Chronicles Handbook [Handbook], Bear
2010 There Were Giants Upon The Earth [Giants], Bear

Strauss, B.,
2006, The Trojan War, Simon & Schuster

Tellinger, M.,
2006, Slave Species of god [Slave Species], Music Masters

Thompson, R.,
1993, Alien Identities, Govardham Hill

Wood, J.,
1984, The Origin of The Moon, Lunar Planet Institute
***
More on the Gods of Old: Anunnaki: Gods No More by Sasha Lessin, Ph.D. (Anthropology, U.C.L.A.)

 

http://vimeo.com/user7362624/sasha-lessin-phd

Sasha Lessin Ph.D from Emmanuel Bombardier on Vimeo.

Listen to internet radio with Aquarian Radio on BlogTalkRadio

The GOD VIRUS web reading from Darrel Ray + Freer & Lessin articles

God virus cover

A THOUGHT EXPERIMENT by Darrel Ray, read by the Lessins, reprinted below

Click arrow above and listen, then read.

 

Janet Kira Lessin and Dr. Sasha Lessin read and comment as they read, A Thought Experiment by Dr. Darrel W. Ray, Ed.D, from his book, The God Virus: How Religion Infects Our Lives and Culture

.

Janet Kira Lessin and Dr. Sasha Lessin read and comment as they read, A Thought Experiment by Dr. Darrel W. Ray, Ed.D, from his book, The God Virus: How Religion Infects Our Lives and Culture

.

Imagine this scenario: You have a serious conversation with a deeply Christian friend. Your friend is intelligent, well educated and knowledgeable. You agree to record the session. The topic is Islam. During the session, you discuss that Mohammed was a self-appointed prophet and that he claimed he talked to Allah and angels. He wrote a book that he claimed is infallible, and he flew from Jerusalem to heaven on a horse.

.

During the conversation, you agree that Mohammed was probably delusional to think he could talk to god. You agree that the Koran was clearly written by Mohammed and not by Allah. It is ludicrous for him to claim that he is the last prophet and that all others are false. Neither you nor your friend can believe that he flew to heaven, let alone on a horse. It all sounds too crazy, and you both agree it is difficult to see how someone could believe such a religion. At the end of the conversation, you say that Muslims did not choose their religion; they were born into it. Anyone who was exposed to both Christianity and Islam would see that Christianity is the true religion.

.

Over the next few days, you transcribe the recording onto paper. Then you change all references to Mohammed and make them Jesus. Now the document reads something like this:
During the conversation, you both agree that Jesus was probably delusional to think he could talk to Jehovah. The Bible was clearly written by men and not by Jehovah. You both agree it is ludicrous for Jesus to claim that he is the last prophet and that all later ones are false. Neither of you can believe that he rose from the dead, nor flew to heaven. It all sounds too crazy, and it is difficult to see how someone could believe such a religion. At the end of the conversation, you both agree that Christians did not choose their religion; they were born into it. Anyone who was exposed to both Christianity and Islam would see that Islam is the true religion.

.

Now, tell your friend, “I made a transcript of our conversation about Islam and would like to go over it with you.” As you read it, watch her reaction. How does she respond to each statement?

.

How soon does she get defensive? How quickly does she start making elaborate arguments that have no more factual basis than the first conversation? If you persist in this line of parallel reasoning, how long before she gets angry or breaks off the conversation? Could this conversation damage your friendship?

.

You can do the same experiment with other prophetic religions. For example, substitute Joseph Smith for Mormonism or Moses for Judaism. This experiment illustrates the god virus at work. It infects the brain and alters critical thinking skills. It leaves the skill intact for other religions but disables critical thinking about one’s own religion. Keep this thought experiment in mind as we explore the virus-like behavior of religion in individuals and in society.

.

Religious visions and conversions have been reported for centuries. They bear remarkable similarities regardless of religion or culture. William James noticed the similarities over a century ago in his book, The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902). What would make an Islamic conversion look and sound like a Christian one? Why would a Hindu epiphany bear a close resemblance to a native American vision quest?

.

Some people who experience a religious conversion seem to undergo a personality change. They can be quite congenial and easygoing when talking about mundane things, but when they start talking about their “faith,” their demeanor changes. Their tone of voice modifies, their smile becomes tense, and they become defensive when questioned about their evidence for belief. It becomes difficult to have a friendly conversation with them. It looks like a scene from the cult movie Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978), where alien pods take over the brains and bodies of people and change them into emotionless automatons.

.

Once a person has converted to a religion, it is difficult to have a rational conversation about the irrational aspects of his religion. It is as though something invaded the person and took over a part of his personality. You can no longer talk to him directly. Instead, it seems as if communication is channeled through a religious being that lives inside of him. Well-rehearsed answers come out of his mouth. Things like, “It is a mystery and we are not meant to understand it.” Or “God expects us to follow his commands without question.” “Jesus spoke to me and I know he is in my heart.” It is quickly evident that rational analysis of these statements is not permitted.

.

Science fiction is full of examples of aliens taking over the minds and bodies of humans to further their own ends, but where did science fiction get the idea? Fact can be stranger than fiction. There are many examples in biology of parasites, pathogens and viruses infecting the brain of a host and controlling the animal’s behavior.

.

The rabies virus infects very specific neurons in the brain of the mammal host to create aggressive behavior. This induces the host to attack and bite animals it might otherwise avoid or ignore. The virus takes over the brain of the host for its own purposes without regard for the well-being of the host, who usually dies.

.

Imagine that a religion is a virus with its own unique mix of properties. Just as the HIV virus is different than a cold virus, both infect and take over the mechanisms of the body in ways that allow them to reproduce. Religions have five useful properties that are present in different degrees, including the ability to:
1. Infect people.
2. Create antibodies or defenses against other viruses.
3. Take over certain mental AND physical functions and hide itself within the individual in such a way that it is not detectable by the individual.
4. Use specific methods for spreading the virus.
5. Program the host to replicate the virus.

.

Every religion is more or less effective in each of these areas. Let us take a closer look at each of these properties. Virtually all religions rely upon early childhood indoctrination as the prime infection strategy. Other infection strategies include proselytizing, offering help and financial aid with strings attached, providing educational opportunities at religious institutions and many other approaches which we encounter frequently in the media and in daily exposure to religion.

.

Childhood religious infection is so strong that it seems to have the power to create a permanent imprint in most people. Imprinting was first identified by Konrad Lorenz and Niko Tinbergen, who won the 1973 Nobel Prize for Physiology and Medicine. In their work with birds and other animals, they showed that many animals learn to identify their parents remarkably fast after birth. In a famous experiment with geese, they demonstrated that substituting a parent figure like a human led to imprinting on the substitute. After imprinting was complete with the substitute, they reintroduced the real parent goose. To their surprise, the goslings could not be reprogrammed to follow the true parent; instead, they followed the substitute figure.
.

This powerful and rapid learning is strong in many animals and appears to be non-reversible most of the time. Perhaps religious infection is similar. Once a person has imprinted to a given religion, he does not easily change religions. The rituals, songs, ceremony, etc., have a way of sticking with some people so that they do not feel complete unless they are in that particular ritual environment.

.

Even an adult host who is not overtly religious can act as if the virus is alive and well in his brain. Inquire about religious beliefs, and the host will recite many of the doctrines he learned at age 5 or 10. Just as the chicken pox virus continues to live quietly in the body after the disease is gone, the god virus may live quietly in the host until something evokes it.
***
.

A NEIL FREER interview by John Colaw from UFO Disclosure

.

“But I also am convinced that, until we get to a consensual, generic definition of human nature and a planetary unity and an unassailable, mature racial integrity we simply won’t be allowed into stellar society.” — Neil Freer“But I also am convinced that, until we get to a consensual, generic definition of human nature and a planetary unity and an unassailable, mature racial integrity we simply won’t be allowed into stellar society.” –Neil Freer.

.
John Colaw: Hello, Neil. You mention the work of Zecharia Sitchin in regards to the tenth planet Nibiru and its inhabitants the Anunnaki, or Nefilim who genetically engineered us as a species from primitive Homo Erectus stock around 250,000 – 300,000 years ago in East Africa. Why does Neil Freer believe the thesis of Zecharia Sitchin when so many “experts” do not? What prevents people from considering this, to me, obvious evidence as to the truth of our past? Why don’t people get it?

.

Neil Freer: I have taught on the college level, Philosophy and History of Religion, but I have tended to dissociate myself from the academic world, the world of the “expert”, because of the control by funding so rampant in that community and the fear of peer pressure to conform to the “expert” consensus paradigm. These are the driving factors that prove out, over and over again, the thesis of Tom Kuhn in his “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”: radical new paradigms are fought, kicking and screaming, regardless of how robust and clear the evidence is, and only accepted when the old guard dies off. So this tendency to tenure tetanus is a primary reason why the “experts” ignore Sitchin’s thesis or try to get him quick and nasty in personal attacks since they haven’t been able to refute him in 24 years.

.

A second reason is that the more intelligent of them realize well that his thesis calls into question not only their data but a fundamental assumption on which their disciplines are founded. They accept as unquestioned that the transcultural “gods” known to all the ancient civilizations were unreal, mythic beings. Sitchin says, just as the Sumerians said, that they were flesh and blood humanoids – and aliens to boot. Even if they allow themselves to entertain the possibility that his thesis is correct, they don’t want to deal with the ramifications. It means that we must literally rethink the entire planet. For an academic scholar to “go first” in a situation like this is a rare case indeed.

.

The situation is made even more difficult because of that magic word “alien”. Even though the Anunnaki are from within our solar system, not from forty light years away like the little grey guys with wraparound eyes, even though we are half Anunnaki and they look very much like we look, the fact that they are from off planet and can be called “alien”, the circles get made ’round the ears and the eyes roll in the “expert” academic community for fear of peers tagging one as a looney-tune. This is complexified by the fact I emphasized in the white paper I published on the web recently, “The Alien Question, An Expanded Perspective”: there are two artificial problems here.

.

We have an abundance of information and evidence that demonstrates the alien presence in general on this planet. The suppression of the entire topic by the government has severely retarded the academic and scientific communities, an artificial problem. We have as much or more evidence and information that we are half alien, a bicameral species brought about through Anunnaki (alien) genetic engineering. But the suppression throughout western history by the Roman Church of that entire paradigm has created the other artificial problem for scholars and humans in general.

.

To balance all this out it is imperative that I qualify by emphasizing that there are, no doubt, honest, sincere, scholars and scientists of great integrity out there who do “get it”, who see that Sitchin is very correct. But it seems that there are not those among them, so far, who have the courage of military warriors like Robert O. Dean or Philip Corso, to risk pension, prosecution and persecution to speak out because they want the truth to prevail.

.

I became convinced of the correctness and validity of Sitchin’s thesis – just as I have become convinced of the correctness and validity of Sir Laurence Gardner‘s thesis recently – not by dry logic or intuition but by its utter coherence: they are the only explanations which contain no inexplicable elements, no contradictions and in which all the facts dance together in total consort.
To qualify precisely further, I do not agree with Zecharia on an incidental point or two and find the same holds true with Sir Laurence’s conclusions, but these are peripheral, not essential core thesis points. In this massive, revolutionary volume of material, it would be amazing if there would be total agreement about details this early on.

.

John Colaw: In your books, Neil, you speak of “genetic enlightenment” being the key to unlocking the “GodSpell”. Could you expand on that please? What is genetic enlightenment, and what is the GodSpell?

.

Neil Freer: I’ve used the word godspell to characterize the subservient, submissive attitude, the deepest dye in our cultural fabric that is the residual slave mentality from our beginnings as a genetically engineered slave race brought into being by the Anunnaki for their own practical purposes, primarily mining gold.

.

Eventually, we became limited partners with them, a stable race, and are just coming out of a three thousand year traumatic transition from racial adolescence. But we were always subject to them and have been standing here looking up in the sky where they went when they phased off overtly (heaven became in the sky where they went, hell became underground where you worked to your death in the gold mines) looking for daddy to return to make everything right and tell us what to do again because we must have done something wrong to make them go away.

.

Over time we have sublimated one of them, Enlil (Jehovah/YHWH) a rather disagreeable, harsh, peevish individual, cruel toward humans, into a cosmic being with infinite characteristics. This metaphysical cosmification process through the Roman Church‘s scholastic theologians has caused a great deal of confusion and obfuscation. When we, individually and racially, become genetically enlightened, we are empowered to break the godspell and become our own independent race and, individually, to become our own person, our own evolutionary artist, ready to go one-on-one with the universe.

.

“Genetic enlightenment, therefore, is simply the realization and recognition of our true history as a genetically engineered species, the primary and cardinal ramification of which is that religion is the sublimation of the ancient, subservient, master-slave relationship between us and the Anunnaki.”

.

John Colaw: For myself, once I have recognized the flesh and blood characteristics of the Annunaki, “those who from heaven came down”, then I am freed to think from a much broader frame of reference than what I have been conditioned to operate within. I, “we” are empowered to tear away the mystical veil of God as “big daddy in the sky”, and forced to deal with the likelihood of a public extraterrestrial encounter. Am I anywhere near the right page on that?

.

Neil Freer: A major result of that genetic enlightenment is that we realize that the entire concept of the Roman Church doctrine of “original sin”, besides being a deliberately skewed translation in the first place, is erroneous. It has been, however, a chief means of making us dependent on some fearful God and, therefore, on the Church which claims proprietary absolute interpretive mandate for what that God wants.

.

As a result of that continuation of Enlil’s domination we are made to believe that we cannot evolve although we can degenerate, that we will sink immediately into depravity without constant supervision and “salvation” from that God, really cannot know truth by ourselves because of this deep flaw.

.

Neil Freer: A major result of that genetic enlightenment is that we realize that the entire concept of the Roman Church doctrine of “original sin”, besides being a deliberately skewed translation in the first place, is erroneous. It has been, however, a chief means of making us dependent on some fearful God and, therefore, on the Church which claims proprietary absolute interpretive mandate for what that God wants.

.

As a result of that continuation of Enlil’s domination we are made to believe that we cannot evolve although we can degenerate, that we will sink immediately into depravity without constant supervision and “salvation” from that God, really cannot know truth by ourselves because of this deep flaw.Genetic enlightenment shows us that we are all our own credentials, our own authorities, that we are really capable of determining the truth, knowing clearly, for ourselves, are not dependent on some authority for the truth. So, to give you a little poke in your half alien ribs, m’ Brother, if you mean by “Am I anywhere near the right page on that?” does your take on this and mine happen to agree, the answer is Yes. If you are looking to me as any kind of authority, however, I’m going to pass……

.

The consideration of the “likelihood of a public extraterrestrial encounter” is an important one for two reasons: our attitude toward incoming entities of all types needs to change for our security before that happens, and that kind of event seems to be getting very close.

.

Because we have been literally invented and conditioned to the subservient godspell slave mentality and have been looking to the sky for the Anunnaki to return for so long, we put ourselves in a very vulnerable and dangerous position. If we continue to tend to look to anything or anyone coming from the sky for answers, solutions, rescue, salvation of any kind, we are in danger of getting Borged.

.

Genetic enlightenment and breaking the God Spell affords us two critical advantages:
1. A planet wide, consensual understanding and definition of what a generic human is and, therefore
2. A planet wide unity beyond any of the Babel factors from religion to race that have divided us and made us vulnerable.

.

If the Anunnaki show up here again, depending on their attitude toward us or which faction among them is represented, we could be respectfully approached or we could find ourselves being issued gold mining tools and/or directed to Enlil’s harem. Whomever shows up here, we should meet as a united planetary race, confident in our own identity, of an unassailable integrity, with a mature caution that prompts us to demand credentials, statements of intention, a discretionary quarantine, and an exchange of essential information about customs from justicial protocols, to eating to sex.

.

We should be able to identify full humanoids from androids. It is certainly true that whoever shows up here will mostly certainly be more advanced technologically and could, if they wished, eat our lunch so to speak. The Anunnaki, however, although obviously capable of doing so from the beginning, have not done so. Clearly the various races that have come here and are here now, although gradually demonstrating that their technology could easily overwhelm or wipe us out, have not done so.

.

Does this mean that we should put caution aside? Certainly not.

.

But it may indicate that our species’ internecine violence is “unnatural”, a product of the divisive Babel-factoring for crowd control that has carried through to great wars and the religious mayhem of crusades, jihads, inquisitions and persecutions and not intrinsically of human nature. I think it points clearly to the simple fact that the farther along in consciousness evolution and intelligence and technological advancement a “natural” race evolves, the more it evolves toward the golden rule, a modern specific application of which is already in our consciousness in the Star Trek “prime directive”.

.

John Colaw: Neil, won’t the “powers that be“, particularly religious and political, oppose any moves towards “genetic enlightenment” of the general population? Do we just wait for the old guard to die out as we educate the new generations? Or perhaps this eventual awakening is an inevitability that cannot be entirely prevented?

.

Neil Freer: The Roman Church, a continuation of the fear of the god, Enlil, type of subservient religion, came into ascendance by an alliance with and gradual assimilation of the Roman empire and adopting its muscular tactics. Suppression of our true history through the promulgation of the Hebrew Old Testament forgeries done to make Enlil their single monotheistic deity was so effective that it effected a sort of racial amnesia and the ancient Sumerian culture literally was forgotten and only rediscovered in the late 1800’s – at least as far as Western culture as we have been taught and known it is concerned.

.

In modern times, the military and political controllers have suppressed the knowledge and data about alien presence on this planet by denial and ridicule, at first sincerely because it was on the basis of friend or foe, as Philip Corso has pointed out so well in “The Day After Roswell”, and anything that could outperform our airplanes and fly over our secret sites with impunity were de facto considered hostile.

.

There was a fear that it would disrupt our entire society radically, even chaotically. Subsequently, I think I agree with Edgar Mitchell, they have not been totally suppressing, but letting it out indirectly a little bit at a time. So the direct and simple answer to your question, I think, is Yes, they oppose genetic enlightenment, obviously more so the Roman Church because its very nature and existence is threatened. But certain signals of recent date seem to indicate a significant turn in this regard.

.

The Roman Church has just reiterated officially that the Pope is still the only one with a direct red phone line to Yahweh’s private saucer while, at the same time, the Pope’s friend, Msgr. Corrado Balducci, unofficially, but neither unfrocked nor poisoned, goes about publicly acknowledging that Sitchin is right and the Anunnaki are coming back soon and Catholics are to be gotten ready for that event. And, oh yes, the Pope would really like to make a pilgrimage (!) to UR In Iraq. One of the oldest cities founded by the Anunnaki. A pilgrimage.

.

We definitely must educate the new generations: It’s the children that must be our focus. We have lost far too many generations to the GodSpell handicap already, including our own. We should not wait for the old guard or the new to pass. We need to take on our own responsibility for our own lives.

.

John Colaw: What do you think of the idea that we are already engaged in a long term conditioning of the population towards an eventual disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence?

.Neil Freer: I think it is a simple, indisputable fact. I think that it would have progressed much faster if we hadn’t been under the GodSpell for so long because we would have been ready much sooner. Many of our problems may be unique to us as a species synthesized for slave purposes. But I also am convinced that, until we get to a consensual, generic definition of human nature and a planetary unity and an unassailable, mature racial integrity we simply won’t be allowed into stellar society.

.

John Colaw: Any comments on the “Evil Invader ET” versus the “Benevolent Space Brother ET” schools of thought? This is major disagreement in UFOlogy.

.

Neil Freer: As above with regard to being slavishly vulnerable and getting Borged.

.

John Colaw: Mr. Sitchin has shown us where there are instructions given by a Babylonian King as how to tell a real Anunnaki from one of their “androids” or robots. Do you think this may offer an explanation as to who the Greys are that appear to be here? Could they be remote or artificial servants of the Anunnaki?

.

Neil Freer: There are several fascinating elements embedded in this topic. It is quite clear from the records that the Anunnaki were technologically advanced enough, at least in the latter times they were here, to develop and use robots if not androids sophisticated enough to require instruction on how to distinguish them from the Anunnaki, much less humans. (Tangentially, our recognition of these facts, just as our recognition of the astrophysics of our solar system’s formation contained in the Enuma Elish, and their knowledge and use of monoatomic elements, would facilitate our own advancement in technology.). There is indication from depictions that some of those robots and/or androids resembled the Greys well known to us.

.

The question is whether the aliens we have experience of in our times are sourced in the Anunnaki or from somewhere else. What sources of reliable information do we have that may shed light on this matter? (U.S. Command Sgt. Major, Ret.) Robert O. Dean, my good friend whose honesty is unquestioned in my opinion, has revealed that the secret NATO alien studies he was privy to during the cold war said that there were some twelve races known to be here (even then in the ’60’s), from Nordic types to rather strange grey types.

.

BREAK THE SPELL OF THE ET GODS WHO ENSLAVED US & THEIR ILLUMINATI SUCCESSORS THAT KEEP US ENSLAVED by Sasha Lessin, Ph.D. (Anthropology, U.C.L.A.).
.

445,000 ago, Ea (Ptah, Buzur, Hephaestus, Vulcan and Adoni), an Extraterrestrial from the planet Nibiru (Sumerians called Ea Enki) which neared Earth every 3,600 years, rocketed to Earth with fifty men. 50 Medics, 600 miners and 300 astronauts and administrators followed them. The Expedition sought gold to refine to floating monoatomic white powder of gold and create a superconductive shield for Nibiru’s decaying atmosphere. Sumerians named the Nibirans Anunnaki–those who came from the sky. Israelites called Nibirans Anakin and Nefilim; Egyptians called Nibirans Neter (Watchers).

.

The Anunnaki found gold aplenty in Africa and South America. Enki incited the African miners to strike, then pressed Enlil (aka Yahweh), the Expedition Chief, to pardon the strikers. Enki would, he said, breed short-term mining slaves to replace the striking Nibirans.

.

To make the slaves, Enki added his genes, his sister Ninmah’s mitochondrial DNA and genes of Homo Erectus or Neanderthalensis, the ancestor of today’s Sasquash. Enki thought the Creator-of-All designed this hominoid to evolve into Homo Sapiens like the Nibirans. Ningiszidda–Enki’s son, Ninmah and Enki expedited the Creator’s design; they made hybrid Earthlings who could breed. We looked like Nibirans, though they sported longer heads and bigger brains. Enki made our men with foreskins Nibiran men lack.

.

Enki created us hybrids short, too. We were short– under six foot tall–versions of the 7- 12 foot tall. He shortened our lifespans vs the Nibiran livespan; his earliest hybrids might last several hundred years, whereas Nibirans lived millions of years. Earth’s orbit, smaller than Nibiru’s, may also shorten Earthlings’ lives. [ZS, Giants: 294 -347]

.

Nibiru revolves around Nemisis, a dark subdwarf star more massive than Jupiter. Nemesis nears our Sun, at the Kuiper Belt, 48 Astronomical Units from Earth, every 10,800 Earth years. Nibiru circles Nemesis but did not our sun. Instead, every 3,600 years Nibiru passes though our inner solar system between Jupiter and Mars. One of Nibiru’s years (the time Nibiru takes to circle Nemesis) is thus 3,600 Earth years–long enough for 180 generations of Homo Sapiens Earthlings to live and die. [Lloyd, Dark Star: 176 -181, 225 – 228]

.

Enki created our ancestors. He and the Nibirans on Earth begat babies with each generation of us Earthlings. Nibirans trained us to mine gold and copper. We tended their crops, livestock and mansions. From 300,000 years ago until the Great Flood, millions of us toiled for the ETs in South Africa.

.

After the Flood, 13,000 years ago, Expedition bosses had us call them “gods.” They made us build temples, palaces, hangars and cities in Sumer, Egypt, Mesoamerica and South America. They taught us astronomy, metallurgy, mathematics, agriculture, herding, writing, architecture and geology to support cities and palaces. They owned and ruled us.

.

Commander Enlil’s descendants, whom Sitchin called Enlilites, ruled the Earthlings of Sumer and India. Chief Scientist Enki’s descendants, whom Sitchin called Enkiites, ruled the Earthlings of Africa, Basara (then called Edin) on the Persian Gulf and Bagdad (then called Babylon). Enlilites and Enkiites pitted Earthling armies against each other. The pushiest Enkiites, Babylon’s god Marduk (aka Ra and Nimrod) and his demigod son Nabu, raised fifth-columns in Canaan and sent Earthling armies to wrest the Sinai Spaceport from the Enlilites. In 2023 B.C., Enlilites nuked the

.

Spaceport and the cities south of the Dead Sea to keep the Spaceport from the Enkiites.

.

Fallout from the bombs spread to Enlil’s Sumer but not Marduk’s Babylon; Babylon nestled north of the nuclear cloud. Sumer’s Enlilite gods fled, but their Earthlings in Sumer, except for those at Edin, whom Enki saved, died. Marduk ruled Sumer for awhile.

.

The Nibirans and the bloodlines of hybrids closest to them genetically (they begat babies on each generation of hybids) still rule Earth. They chain us in matrices of religion, war and business. Power hierarchies dedicated to Yahweh and Allah compete to the death.

.

Sumer’s history warns us to cast off the hierarchical godspell and mind-set of the Nibirans–Enlil, the patriarchal and genocidal Nibiran ommander who left Earth in 2024 B.C. as well as woman-degraders Marduk and Nannar and mass-killer Inanna who stayed on Earth.

.

Nibirans taught us to war, fight, enslave, slave, defoliate and pollute. Each Nibiran god made us obey blindly. Some Earthlings fled mines and cities of the gods, hid in hinterlands far from ET abuse and wars, no longer fodder for spears, arrows, chariots, explosives, lasers, gas and biological agents.

.

Science confirms what the ETs saw and charted when they rocketed to Earth from beyond the parts of the solar system Earthlings could see. The Nibirans saw Earth as they neared it from space outside Neptune’s orbit. They saw Earth recede as they rocketed to rejoin Nibiru as it moved past Neptune to orbit around Nemesis.

.

Nibirans gave us physics, astronomy and biology better than we have now. Just nowadays, researchers verify genetic, metallurgical, geological, mathematic and astronomical data. We validate with hard data predictions and principles inscribed on the ancient Sumerian tablets dictated, say the Sumerians, by ETs.

.

The truth of our origins frees us from the “godspell.” Philosopher Neal Freer defines godspell as our yearning for Nibirans’ return and rule. But Earthling religions under the spell of gods obsessed on genealogical status, hierarchy, male rule and war. They trained the Nibiran in each of us, the part that fights, kills and grasps.

.

The Earthling Hominoid–Erectus or Neanderthlal in us–the short-lived hominoid the Nibirans altered–resonates with Gaia, this planet where they evolved, perhaps even planted there, Pye would have it, by ancient terraformers millions of years before the Nibirans came to mine Earth’s gold.  The ancient hominoid, tuned into this planet, exhibited a natural cooperativeness and capacity for interspecies empathy the Nibirans lacked.

.
When we know and balance our Nibiran and Gaian energies, we break the godspell, become peers rather than servants of the gods. We embrace both our Nibiran and our Erectus natures, our capacities to strive and compete as well as capacities to support, encourage, love and celebrate every consciousness.
.

References Pages in citations are signaled by a colon [:] preceding the page number

Alford, A., 1996, Gods of the New Millennium: Scientific Proof of Flesh and Blood Gods, Eridu Books

Bauval, R., and Hancock, G.,1996, The Keeper of Genesis, Mandarin

Bramley, W., 1989, The Gods of Eden, Avon

Cremo, M. and Thompson, R., 1993, Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race, Torchlight

Cremo, M., 2003, Human Devolution: A Vedic Alternative to Darwin’s Theory, Torchlight 2001, Forbidden Archeology’s Impact, Torchlight

Freer, N., 1999, God Games, Book Tree 2000, Breaking the Godspell, Book Tree 2004, Sapiens Rising, neilfreer.com/SRPAGE2.html 2004b, The Alien Question, neilfreer.com/SRPAGE8.html 2008, Sapiens Rising: The View From 2100, Electronic Dragon

Hazelton, L., 2007, Jezebel, Doubleday

Kramer, S., 1971, The Sumerians, University of Chicago

Lessin, S., 2012, Anunnaki, Gods No More, Createspace 2000, www.enkispeaks.com/wordpress 2011, “ETs from Planet Nibiru”, UFOs and Supernatural Magazine, Vol 1:2 2011, “A Chat with Dr. Sasha Lessin”, UFOs and Supernatural Magazine, Vol 1:2 2011 “Extraterrestrials Engineered Our Species” UFOs and Supernatural Magazine, Issue 4 2011, “ The Anunnaki’s Great Deluge: The True and Original Story ” UFOs and Supernatural Magazine, Feb-March Issue

Osman,A., 2002, Moses & Akhenaten, Bear

Sitchin, Z. [ZS in text attributions] 1976, The 12th Planet, Avon 1983, The Stairway to Heaven [Stairway], Avon 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men [Wars], Avon 1990, Genesis Revisited Avon 1990, The Lost Realms Avon 1993, When Time Began [Time], Avon 1995, Divine Encounters [Encounters], Avon 1996, Of Heaven and Earth, Book Tree 1998 The Cosmic Code, Avon 2002, The Lost Book of Enki [Enki], Bear 2004, The Earth Chronicles Expeditions [Expeditions], Bear 2007, The End of Days, HarperCollins 2007, Journeys to the Mythical Past [Journeys], Bear 2009 The Earth Chronicles Handbook [Handbook], Bear 2010 There Were Giants Upon The Earth [Giants], Bear

Tellinger, M., 2006, Slave Species of god [Slave Species], Music Masters 2009, Temples of the African Gods, [Temples], Zulu Planet 2011, White Powder of Gold, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tp-WNrwQhk 2012a Temples of the African Gods, 2012b

Velikovsky, I., Undated, In The Beginning
***

More on the Gods of Old: Anunnaki: Gods No More by Sasha Lessin, Ph.D. (Anthropology, U.C.L.A.)

http://enkispeaks.com/books/anunnaki-gods-no-more/

<a href=”http://enkispeaks.com/books/anunnaki-gods-no-more/”>http://enkispeaks.com/books/anunnaki-gods-no-more/</a>

http://vimeo.com/user7362624/sasha-lessin-phd

WAR: GIFT OF SO-CALLED GODS: Web Radio and article by Sasha Lessin, Ph.D.

UFO Attack on Dwarva, Krishna's City

 Click arrow and hear show

War MUslims Christians

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anthony Pagden, in The 2,500-year Struggle Between East & West, reviews the depressing history of what he considers “inevitable” war on Earth for the last 2,500 years.  But war isn’t inevitable.

But consider the older history that led to the wars Pagden discusses.  ETs from the planet Nibiru inflicted war on us. Warring isn’t intrinsic to our species.  Enslaving, genocidal, narcissistic, misogynistic, 12 foot-tall, technologically-advanced Nibiran Homo Sapiens scripted us to kill each other long before 2,500 years ago.

The ETs programmed us to war. We deprogram ourselves from armed conflict when we realize the Nibirans imposed the killing program on us. Then we transcend war and return to the empathetic, peace-loving aspects of our nature.

Pagden says, relative to Islam and the West, “Islam is based upon divine decree.  In the West, every aspect of life is a question of human choice. For the Muslim that’s an offense against God. Permanent war will endure till the whole world accepts the truth of Mohammad’s revelation. Although truces are acceptable, the war can never end before victory. Every believer must join Jihad–God’s war against  non-Muslims and their Muslim accomplices–until everyone accepts Islam exactly as in the Qur’an, the words god spoke to Mohammad. It’s the duty of all muslims, says Pagden,” to kill you if you don’t.”[Pagan 2008, 172, 523- 525]

Islam, Pagden writes, must forever follow the rules of an Anunnaki god in Iraq (then called Sumer). That big alien was probably Marduk, Nannar/Sin, Adad or Enlil–forced upon Mohammad in 610 B.C..

Peruse Sumer’s evidence, and you stop the Qur’an’s  murderous rule as well as the warlike conditioning we all get. We can instead empathize, tolerate, support all people. Westerners, Easterners, Northerners, Southerners can break the godspell, the murderous, greedy, hierarchic attitudes of the Nibiran astronauts who founded Sumer and their adherents who have controlled this planet to date. 

Here’sTHE STORY FROM SUMERWar Sumer

Zecharia Sitchin’s data on how ET geneticists engineered our species and how these ETs–giants from the Planet Nibiru–taught us to kill for status and war for them.  He describes wars the Nibirans inflicted on us from 500,000 years ago until 2024 B.C..  His facts can end the stranglehold and addictions to killing for or obeying so-called gods.  

Sitchin exposes the mindset that governments, religions–Christian, Muslim and Jewish– establishment scientists, slavers and corporations perpetrate by denying our true origins.

Sitchin cites archaeological records of an atmospheric crisis 445,000 years ago on the planet Nibiru, a planet that then crossed Earth’s orbit every 3,600 years. Long-lived twelve to eighteen-foot tall modern humans lived in a military dictatorship on Nibiru.   445,000 ago, Nibirans–administrators, medical officers, 600 miners and 300 shuttle crewmen–rocketed to Earth for gold to shield Nibiru’s diminishing atmosphere. They first found ample gold in Africa.

300,000 years ago, the Nibiran scientist Enki responded to a problem he created. He staged a mutiny of the miners in Africa. His solution to the mutiny: genetically alter Homo Erectus, a southeast African human who devolved from ancient setters who’d been decimated by Earth’s periodic astronomical catastrophes.  Enki would engineer Nibiran genes and Erectus’– into hybrid Earthlings–us–to mine and refine gold.

Expedition officers taught us also to raise crops for ourselves and for the expedition’s personnel in Mesopotamia. 

Nibirans enjoyed us slaves sexually as well, and regularly added their genes to our gene pool to make us, today’s Homo Sapiens, like them, though we lack their longevity. They taught us to worship them as gods and war against our fellow hybids who supported other astronauts.

After the Deluge 13,000 years ago, the Nibirans had their Earthlings build cities in Sumer. The ET s lived in luxury in ziggurat castles next to their aircraft hangars. They picked priest-kings–direct descendants of one of Enki’s sons with his overseer’s Earthling wife–to run us.  One of these priest-kings was Mohammad.

Way before Mohammad’s time, the Nibirans kept breeding with us.  They taught us to mine, soldier, build and keep records for them. They gave us astronomy, mathematics, agriculture, herding, writing, architecture, geology and sexual pleasure-giving as well as warfare. Some Nibirans dictated memoirs, their slants on the Expedition.

Nibirans on Earth split into two enemy lineages, both of which used us as soldiers against each other. The lineage of Enki’s son Marduk and his Earthlings fought the lineage of Enki’s brother Enlil, and Enlil’s people. Nibirans taught us genocidal war, violence, slaving, defoliation, male domination, hierarchical thinking and lust for gold. We fought their wars as told. Mostly.  

Some of us escaped the Nibirans’ mines, armies and settlements. We fled to the hinterlands, away from Nibiran wars. We quit as fodder for spears, arrows and chariots as well as their aircraft, weather control devices, explosives, lasers, gas and biological agents.

It got worse.  In 2023 B.C. the Nibirans nuked  Earthling cities in Canaan and accidentally poisoned Iraq.

Fleeing Iraq and leaving it to Marduk, some Nibiran lords created new civilizations throughout the world.  Others returned, via Nazca, Peru, to Nibiru.

“Our intelligence has been suppressed, our knowledge has been erased, our lifespan has been genetically shortened and our memory has been removed. Our genes have been tampered with, resulting in the shutting down of most of them (97%) leaving behind an unintelligent, primitive and subservient creature. We are an inferior, genetically-cloned mutation of the great civilizations of the past, left behind….The ancient ‘gods’ who populated the world and enslaved humankind may still be active among us, not allowing knowledge to spread, keeping their firm grip through religious oppression over their ‘slave species.'” [Tellinger, M., 2006, Slave Species of god, Pages 9, 58, 114]

With Sitchin’s evidence we free ourselves for a new paradigm, a paradigm unfettered by the”godspell”. Godspell’s philosopher Neal Freer’s word for the yearning of Earthlings for the return of their Nibiran Lords. This yearning spawned competing religions that, like Islam as Pagdam sees it, that tell us to it’s our duty to hate and kill anyone who rejects your religion.

And the gods, remember, are merely long-lived, technologically advanced humans with a wide range of individual quirks and a hierarchic, largely patriarchal, warlike culture.  The gods were, by and large, obsessed with genealogical precedence and male superiority. Most gods were petty, homicidal slavers, contemptuous of Earthlings’ consciousness. And genetically we’re half Nibiran, with their genetic propensity to violence, greed and genocidal competition.

Here’s some samples of how gods got us into the kill all the others syndrome that to this day affects Islam:

8670 B.C. THE SECOND PYRAMID WAR

Ninurta and the Enlilites had waited 300 years from when Seth and his people (Enkiites, descendents of Noah’s son Ham) occupied Canaan. The Enlil clan warred to regain control of the Space facilities there. Inanna, Enlil’s son’s daughter, joined the Enlilite attack on Marduk’s forces, in the Second Pyramid War [Sitchin, Z., 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men, pages 156-158]

“The Enlilites launched war to control the space related [Marker] peaks–Mount Moriah, The Harsag ( Mount St. Katherine) in the Sinai and the artificial mount, the Ekur (The Great Pyramid) in Egypt.” [Sitchin, Z., 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men, page 158]

Enlil’s eldest son Ninurta led his lineage, the Enkiites against Marduk’s lineage, the Enlilites. He flew his new jet with a 75-foot wingspan over Marduk’s strongholds, which he blasted. Adad, Enlil’s youngest son, roamed behind enemy lines.”  He wasted Marduk and Marduk’s brothers’ fish, cattle, food and Earthlings. Marduk’s surviving armies retreated into the mountains but Inanna blasted them with “an explosive beam that tore the enemy apart” and forced them south. Ninurta then led the Enlilite forces “in an attack on the heartland of Nergal’s African domain and his temple-city Meslam. They scorched the earth and made the rivers run red with the blood of the innocent bystanders–the men women and children of the Abzu. [Africa].” [Sitchin, Z., 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men, pageS 159 – 163, based on Lugal-eUd Melam-bi in Geller, S., 1917 Altorientalische Texte und Untersuchungen].

NINURTA SHOT POISON MISSILES ON THE AFRICANS

Ninurta rained on the city poison-bearing missiles. The poison by itself destroyed the city. Those who survived the attack on the city fled to the surrounding mountains. But Ninurta “with the Weapon that Smites threw fire upon
the mountains, smote down the people.

INANNA & SARGON EXTENDED HER POWER OVER MOST OF MESOPOTAMIA
Inanna and Sargon

Expedition Commander Enlil and his cohorts in Sumer unified under a fighting general to confront Marduk’s push for rule.. “To [Enlil’s granddaughter] Inanna, of Marduk the adversary, the task of the right man to find they entrusted” [Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki, page 300].

In 2400 B.C., Inanna chose her gardener, Sargon, the Akkadian warrior king the to lead her Earthling armies and rule all Sumer for her. He rose from gardener to king because he raped her and she enjoyed it. [Ferguson deduces that Sargon was Inanna’s half brother.]  Sargon’s father was also Inanna’s: Nannar Sin.  Inanna’s grandfather, Enlil, had fathered Nannar.  So Enlil found it easier to ratify his hybrid descendant Sargon as ruler of most of Mesopotamia. [Ferguson, V., “Inanna Returns,” in Of Heaven and Earth, Z. Sitchin, Ed., page 95]

Sargon began his rise when he saw Inanna snooze in his garden. He bent over her perfect face and lightly, then, as she–half awake–responded, kissed her savagely. He entered her as she opened her eyes and her eyes shone with
pleasure. Sargon, she declared, was her lover. Inanna, as we shall see, repeatedly joins powerful aggressive Adapite men to lead her armies.

Inanna convinced Enlil to ratify her choice of a warrior king. So the strongman she choose was Sargon of course. Sargon would unify the cities Sumer and protect the Enlilite lords for whom the cities existed.

Sargon and Inanna ruled from in Akkad, as they called their kingdom, from their capital Agade, which they built near Babylon. “The Akkadian language, written in a wedge-like (cuneiform) script, was the mother tongue of all the Semitic languages, of which Hebrew and Arabic are still in use.”

Sargon and Inanna used her weapons and technology to defeat all rivals in Mesopotamia, save Lagash northeasten of Sumer (Lagash was the domain of Inanna’s Uncle Ninurta). Inanna employed a light from her aircraft to lead Sargon’s army through Zagros Mountain passes of Luristan. [Sitchin, Z., 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men, page 10 -11].

In 2316 B.C., while Marduk and his son Nabu were in Egypt, Sargon invaded Marduk’s stronghold, Babylon, took soil from the city, then withdrew to plant it Agade. “to understand the severity of this deed, recall the meaning of
Babylon/Bab-Ili–Gateway to the Gods–a title and function claimed for Babylon by a defiant Marduk, it was symbolized by its hallowed soil. Encouraged by Inanna, Sargon took away the sacred soil to spread it as a new foundation for the new Bab-ili, audaciously aiming to transfer the title and the function to Agade. [Sitchin, Z.,1985, The Wars of Gods and Men, page 250]

Marduk and Nabu returned from Egypt to Babylon. They fortified the city and diverted rivers from the other Sumerian cities. Marduk said he’d build his spaceport in Babylon. “In the heart of Edin, in the midst of the First Region, Marduk himself established!

“Inanna’s fury no boundaries knew; with her weapons on Marduk’s followers death she inflicted. The blood of people, as never before on Earth, like rivers flowed.” [Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki, page 301] She and Sargon
fought Marduk; both sides used laser weaponry on each other’s Earthlings.

“While Inanna remained gorgeous and enticing, Sargon began to age and drink too much. Inanna watched helplessly as the man she once loved passionately crumbled into a pathetic drunk afflicted by insomnia, haunted by demons.” He died besieged by Marduk’s minions, but before Sargon died he cursed Inanna. Ferguson, V., “Inanna Returns,” in Of Heaven and Earth, Z. Sitchin, Ed., page 97]

INANNA & NERGAL PLANNED TO RULE THE EARTH

The Anunnaki Council asked Marduk’s brother, Nergal of Kuth, to disarm Marduk and Babylon. Nergal and his retinue of Black Earthlings left south Africa for Babylon.

En route to Babylon, Nergal visited Inanna in Uruk. Though she was Enlilite and Nergal an Enkiite, Nergal (an Enkiite) allied himself with her against his brother, Marduk (also of Enki’s lineage). Marduk ruled Egypt, above Nergal and Erkishkigal’s realm in the South of Africa, and Marduk’s claim to rule all Earth alarmed Nergal. And Nergal found Inanna alluring. It was not surprising then, that Nergal and Inanna became lovers. The lovers, one of the house of Enlil, one of the house of Enki, together planned Marduk’s defeat. They also planned to conquer all Earth for themselves.

Nergal Betrayed Marduk. When Nergal left Inanna, he and his African men continued to Babylon, where Marduk greeted them. Nergal promised Marduk, if he’d leave Babylon immediately for South Africa, he could get weapons and computers hidden there since the Deluge. Marduk took the bait and left for South Africa.

As soon as Marduk left Babylon for South Africa, Nergal broke into Marduk’s control room and snatched his “brilliance” (energy radiation source), which controlled the irrigation system for all Mesopotamia.

Enki, Nergal’s father, banished Nergal back to Africa, but Nergal left a garrison of his African men near Babylon, where they could aid Inanna. Inanna then publically, “to defy the authority of Anu and Enlil, abrogated their rules
and regulations and declared herself Supreme Queen.” [Ancient text, Queen of all the MEs; Sitchin, Z., 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men, page 254]

In 2291 B.C., “In the First Region [Mesopotamia], Enlil and Ninurta absent were, to the lands beyond the oceans Inanna and Nergal went; In the Second Region [the Nile], Ra was away, as Marduk in other lands he traveled; Her chance in her hands to seize all powers Inanna envisioned.” [Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki, page 303]

Inanna, Naram-Sin ( Sargon’s grandson) and the Akkadian armies captured Baalbek, the spaceport in Lebanon. Then they stuck out along the Mediterranean coast for the Sinai Spaceport and Mission Control in Jerusalem. They marched across the Forth Region, the region taboo to Earthlings (across the Jordan from Tell Ghassul, the astronauts’ private city). Ninurta’s city, Lagash[Tello], was able to hold out against Inanna and Naram-Sin.

Then Inanna and the Akkadians conquered Jerico.

Jerico switched alliance from Inanna’s father, Nannar, to her.  Inanna’s armies, under Naram-Sin, joined Nergal’s black Kuthians, and conquered Egypt.

In 2255 B.C., Inanna recaptured Uruk, destroyed Anu’s temple there and sent Naram-Sin to attack Enlil’s minions at Nippur. She thus declared herself supreme to even Anu, King of Nibiru and father of Enlil, her father’s father.

Enlil commanded his son Ninurta and Ninurta’s cavalry and army of Gutiums (from the Zagros Mountains of northeast Mesopotamia) to reconquer Sumer and kill all Earthlings in Akkad/Agade.

Ninurta’s forces laid waste to most of Sumer; they spared only Ninurta’s city, Lagash.

Enlil ordered death for Inanna’s strongman, King Naram-Sin, for his attack on Nippur. Enlil’s agents got a scorpion to sting and kill the King.

Enlil also ordered Inanna arrested. Granddaughter Inanna claimed sanctuary with her parents–her father Nannar (a son of Enlil) and Ningal, her mother. Inanna, however, fled to Nergal’s Lower Africa, where she and Nergal spent seven years plotting new ways to overthrow the Council.

“Humans had little choice but to follow the instructions from their brutal gods who showed no regard for human life. Clashes between the gods almost always involved humans, who never knew the reasons for warring against their neighbors.  Aggression of one group of earthlings against another initiated by their god set the behavioral pattern for all future human conflict. Humankind perceived this kind of activity as `the normal thing to do’ to invade and conquer your neighbor’s land.

“God would command his people to invade and attack, giving his human armies the excuse that they were vile and evil and they were sinful against god. But this god would differ from land to land, demanding total obedience from humans, or they would be punished. This led to the worship of many different gods by people of the biblical lands as they worshiped the specific gods who led them into battle or out of harms way. This worshiping would lead to retribution from some other Anunnaki god with a higher rank, demanding that people worship only him.  And so the clashes between groups of people continue…” [Tellinger, M., 2008, Slave Species of god, pages 502 -503]

The Gutians who subdued Inanna’s rebellion of 2255 B.C. and Gutian calvary supported Ninurta’s rebuilding of Mesopotamia returned to the Zagros Mountains 2160B.C.. and Ninurta’s brother Nannar ruled Sumer for ninety-one years. The Era of Ninurta, an era of agricultural development. During this time Nannar, no longer eclipsed by daughter Inanna, ruled Sumer.

CLUMSY DEATH OF ENLILITES’ CHOOSEN KING, TWO THIRDS NIBIRAN UR-NAMMU, DESTABILIZED SUMER

In 2113 B.C.E., Enlil choose Ur-Nammu, son of the the goddess Ninsun as Supreme King of Sumer/Akadda. Anu approved Ur-Nammu. “The choice was a signal that the glorious days under the unchallenged authority of Enlil and his clan are back.” [Sitchin, Z., 2007, The End of Days, page 52].The King would serve under Enlil’s son Nannar who’d dictate laws of obedience, justice and morality. [Sitchin, Z., 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men, pages 262-264; 2007, The End of Days, page 60 -61]

The Enlilites ordered Ur-Nammu to attack Marduk’s Amorite followers to the west of Sumer, where Nabu, Prophet of his father, Marduk, had been agitating for rule of Earth to pass from Enlil to Marduk. Enlil gave Ur-Nammu a “divine weapon that heaps up the rebels in piles with which to attack the hostile lands, destroy the evil cities and clear them of opposition. Enlilites referred to Nabu as “the oppressor” and the areas of his influence “evil, sinning and rebel.” The “gods” of Sumer thus gave Ur-Nammu blessing, honor, weapons and their protection.

But in 2096 B.C.E., “in the midst of battle, his chariot got stuck in the mud; Ur-Nammu fell off it, the chariot rushed along, leaving the King behind. The boat returning Ur-Nammu’s body to Sumer sank with him on board.” In Sumer, “The people could not understand how such a religiously devout king who only followed gods’ directives with weapons they put in his hands could perish so ignominously.” Support of Utu, Nannar, Inanna, Enlil and even Anu couldn’t protect him.

Shulgi, who succeeded Ur Nammu, was so effective and powerful that Inanna invited him to visit her in Uruk. She announced Shulgi was “the man chosen for the vulva of Inanna.” They were ceremonially joined in the temple where Anu had once elevated her in tantric ritual. She again became lovers with an alpha Adapite [Sitchin, Z., 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men, pages 276 -279].

The people of Sumer became more receptive to Nabu’s preaching that the Enlilite gods had deceived and deserted them, Nibiru would return in the constellation The Ram–Marduk’s constellation–sooner than the Enlilites said. Nibiru’s return, said Nabu, would herald the Era of Marduk, the Redeemer, who would conquer Sumer & Akkad and their Elamite, Hittite and Sealand allies and the whole world. [Sitchin, Z., 2007, The End of Days, page 63 – 66]

Ninharsag and Enki decided Nabu, rather than Enlilite Utu/Shamash could command Tilmun, the Nibirans’ post-flood spaceport. From Tilmum, Nabu spread the word of Marduk’s coming supremacy to the cities and islands of the Eastern Mediterranean.

Shulgi, who succeeded Ur Nammu in 2095 B.C., was so effective and powerful at first that Inanna invited him to visit her in Uruk. She proclaimed Shulgi “the man chosen for the vulva of Inanna.” They ritually joined in the temple where Anu had once elevated her in tantric ritual. Another alpha Adapite Earthling for Inanna! [Sitchin, Z., 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men, pages 276 -279].

Shulgi and his Elamite allies launched military expeditions in the West and built The Great West Wall from the Euphrates to the Tigris (north of modern Baghdad) to keep out Nabu’s forces. But in 2048 B.C.E., Enlil had Shulgi
killed for his sexploitations and failures to drive Nabu from Tilmum. Enlil replaced Shulgi with the latter’s son, Amar-Sin.

The Enlilites sent Amar-Sin to crush a rebellion in the north and fight an alliance of five kings along the Mediterranean in the west. [Sitchin, 2007, The End of Days, pages 68-72]

GALZU VISION LED ENLIL TO CHOOSE ABRAHAM TO BLOCK MARDUK

Enlil, at this time, had a dream visitation from the mysterious Galzu, whom the Anunnaki regarded as representative of the Creator of All. Enlil told no one of the vision. Galzu warned him that when Earth moved zodiacally from the Age of the Bull to the Age of the Ram, Marduk would rule the Earth. Galzu told Enlil “a
righteous and worthy man must be choosen, by him and his seed will Civilized Man be preserved! “

Enlil kept Galzu’s vision to him secret, he prepared to create a mobile general who could stop incursions by Marduk and his son Nabu. Enlil ordered his son Nannar to have Tirhu, Nannar’s high-priest/king [ie, hybrid of much Anunnaki ancestry] establish Harran, for Enlil had plans for Tirhu’s son, Ibruum.

2048 BC: Enlil sent Ibruum/Abraham from Harran on missions to thwart Marduk’s moves to position his forces to capture the spaceport on the Sinai. “Protect the sacred places, the chariots’ ascents and descents enable, Enlil Ibruum to go commanded.” As soon as Ibruum left Harran, Marduk moved in and spent the next twenty-four years planning his take-over of Earth [Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki, pages 302 – 306].

In 2041 Ibruum and his cavalry blocked a coalition of kings near the (not yet but soon to be) Dead Sea at a fortified oasis at Kadesh-Barnea (Dur-Mah-Ilani), “the closest place where men could approach in the region of the spaceport
without special permission. The war was intended to prevent the return of Marduk _[to Babylon] and thwart the efforts of [Marduk’s son] Nabu to gain access to the spaceport.” [Sitchin, Z., 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men, pages 302 – 307].

Ibruum/Abraham was Enlil’s loyal general. Enlil “equipped him with the best chariots, finest horses. ” Abraham won many skirmishes for Enlil, “defending the spaceport in the Sinai which was out of bounds to all humans. Abraham had a crack squad of 380 well-trained, well-armed soldiers. “

Enlil gave Abraham weapons that “could smite an army of ten thousand men in hours.” Enlil rewarded him with riches and land which made Ibruum the richest man of his time.

Enlil’s emissaries/angels–Ninurta and Nergal–“used Abraham and his nephew” [Lot] to spy on Sodom and Gomorra, cities Marduk controlled. From Sodom and Gomorra, Enlil feared, Marduk “would marshal his large number of human followers and take control of all establishments on Earth, including Enlil’s spaceport.” _[Tellinger, M. 2006, Slave Species of god, page 506]

So far, Anunnaki from Nibiru and their direct descendents (“gods”–as they had the Adapite Hybrid Homo Sapiens call them), knew they’d soon have enough of Earth’s gold to shield Nibiru’s atmosphere. Then they could go home to Nibiru.  They’d leave the Hybrids to fend for themselves.

So the Anunnaki let the Hybrids proliferate and slave for them. Hybrids worked for Anunnaki leaders as well as for lesser, more local Anunnaki “gods”–lesser nobility and astronauts (Igigi) from Nibiru. Many gods ordered Hybrids to war against armies of rival gods. Gods lesser and greater loosed laser, explosive and biological weapons against their rivals’ Hybrids.

Anunnaki Commander Enlil and Enlil’s son and Champion, Ninurta, used Hybrid armies and Nibiran weapons_in Mesopotamia to subdue Inanna and her Kings Ur-Nammu and Shulgi when they invaded the Anunnaki reserve in the Spaceport area.

Marduk/Ra proclaimed divine right, as heir of Enki and Damkina (Daughter of King Alalu) to rule Earth.

Long ago, the Nibiran Counsel and then King, Alalu, declared the son of Prince Anu’s son Ea/Enki with Alalu’s daughter, Damkina, would be Alalu’s Successor.  The son Damkina bore as Enki’s wife was Marduk/Ra. Marduk was a legitimate successor to the throne of Nibiru.

Later, however, Marduk’s greatgrandfather Anu deposed Alalu. Marduk migrated to Earth.

King Anu and the Council banned Marduk from Nibiru for marrying the Hybrid Sarpanit. The Council would not risk the return of Marduk as potential claimant to rule. The Nibirans refused to have a pretender with sons begat with a hybrid wife he took from an illegally bred slave species–a species proving far too intelligent to introduce as migrants to Nibiru.

Marduk’s proclamation that the time had come for him to rule the Earth resonated with Enlil’s vision. In Enlil’s vision Galzu, representative of the Creator of All, said Marduk would rule Earth when the Anunnaki left.

GODS NUKED SINAI SPACEPORT BEFORE THEY LEFT EARTH TO MARDUK

Narrative resumes: Marduk proclaimed to the senior Anunnaki gods, “In my temple house let all the gods assemble, my covenant accept….By his appeal for their submission, the Anunnaki gods were disturbed and alarmed.

To a great assembly, council to take, Enlil them all summoned. Opposed to Marduk and Nabu they all were.” They agreed that if they were to abandon Earth to Marduk and Nabu to rule when they were gone, they’d at least deny them the Spaceport in the Sinai. The senior Anunnaki–all except Enki–agreed to use nuclear weapons stop Nabu’s advance through Canaan toward the spaceport. [Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki, pages 308].

Enki says he, “angry and distraught, the council chamber left, in his heart was Enki smiling: only he knew where [In Africa] the weapons were hidden, so did Enki think. For it was he, before Enlil to Earth had come, who with Abgal in a place unknown the weapons did hide. That Abgal, to the Exiled Enlil, the place disclosed, that to Enki was unknown. Thus it was that without Enki needing, Enlil to the two heros [Ninurta and Nergal] the hiding place disclosed. ” [Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki, page 306 – 307].

The Anunnaki Council on Earth radioed King Anu back on Nibiru: would he authorize nukes against the spaceport and against Nabu and his human armies? Anu gave his okay. Marduk, after all, believed he should rule Nibiru, as per the dynastic agreement between King Alalu and Anu. Marduk threatened Anu in every way. So Anu told Enlil use the nuclear missiles to stop Marduk.

Enlil evacuated the Igigi Astronauts from the Sinai and sent Ninurta and Nergal (the “angels” of the Bible) to confirm from his spies in Canaan–Ibruum and Lot–that they should bomb Sodom, Gomorra and other cities allied with Marduk. Enlil gave his spies time to flee, then ordered the attack.

2024 BC, Enlil’s son Ninurta attacked the Sinai. “The first terror weapon [a missile called One Without Rival] from the skys Ninurta let loose; the top of Mount Mashu [where the controlling equipment was housed] with a flash it sliced
off, the mount’s innards in an instant it melted. Above the Place of the Celestial Chariots [rocketships] the second weapon [called Blazing Flame] he unleashed, with a brilliance of seven suns the plain’s rocks into a gushing wound were made, the Earth shook and crumbled, the heavens after the brilliance were darkened; with burnt and crushed stones was the plain of the chariots covered, of all the forests that the plain had surrounded, only tree stems were
left standing.” [Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki, page 310]

Nergal bombed his brother Marduk’s forces in Canaan [Enki sired both Marduk and Nergal; [Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki, pages 315 – 316].  Nergal nuked Sodom, Gomorra and three other cities Ibruum had identified as allied with Marduk. Nergal’s nukes made the Dead Sea dead. To this day, “the water of springs surrounding the Dead Sea has been contaminated with radioactivity, `enough to induce sterility..in any animals and humans that absorbed it…'”

Archeologists confirm the flooding, abandonment of the area and sudden deadening of life in 2024BC. “Over the five cities … Erra [Nergal] upon each from the skies a terror weapon sent, the five cities he finished off, all that lived
there to vapor [erroneously called “salt” by translators] was turned. … Mountains toppled, where the sea waters were barred the bolt broke open,down into the valley the sea’s waters poured, by the waters was the valley flooded.”
_[Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki, page 311].

Sitchin [http://www.sitchin.com/evilwind.htm] writes that, starting in 1999, scientists found evidence that the depopulation of Sumer coincided with abrupt climate change [See Science, April 27, 2001 and Geology, April 2000]. DeMenocal, who wrote the article in Science cited in brackets above, used as evidence for the abrupt changes in the area’s vegetation, rocks called tephera. Tephera are “burnt-through pieces of blackened gravel-like rock” usually associated with volcanos. Tephera still cover Sinai–which lacks volcanos. Sinai’s tephera result from Ninurta’s bombing of the spaceport. The bombing left a huge black scar on the Sinai plain (where the shuttlecraft runway and launch platform had been) so large it can only be seen from satellite. Millions of black-blasted rocks, north northeast of the scar in an area where all other color rocks–no black–are found. [See photos, The Wars of Gods and Men, 1985, pages 332-334]

Nergal and Ninurta flew over the areas they’d just bombed.

“The Place of Launching, the Spaceport, obliterated: the Mount within which the controlling equipment was placed was smashed; the launch platforms were made to fade off the face of the Earth. The plain whose hard soil the shuttlecraft had used as runways were obliterated, with not even a tree left standing. “
[Sitchin, Z. 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men page 331]

“By the darkening of the skies were the brilliances followed, then a storm began to blow, gloom from the skies an Evil Wind carried. From the Upper Sea, a stormwind began blowing, the dark-brown cloud eastward toward Shumer the death was carried. Whereever it reached, death to all that lives mercilessly it delivered.

“The alarm Enlil and Enki to the gods of Shumer transmitted, Escape! From their cities the gods did flee.

“The people of the land by the evil storms hand were clutched. Those who behind locked doors hid inside their houses like flies were felled. Those who in the streets fled, in the streets were their corpses piled up. Everything that lived perished.”

But Babylon, “where Marduk his supremacy declared , by the Evil Wind was spared.” [Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki, pages 312 – 313]. _Enlil concluded that Marduk was now to be supreme on Earth, as his vision of Galzu had
predicted.

After the nuclear cloud killed its inhabitants, “It took southern Mesopotamia a century to be resettled and another century to fully recover from the divine annihilation. By then the center of Mesopotamian power had shifted to Babylon” where Marduk, after 1800 B.C., gave Hammurabi a powerful techno-weapon which let Babylon extend its boundaries. Marduk’s “extended family in northern Mesopotamia, the Aryans, invaded the lands to the east and Europe to the west, conquering humans everywhere and imposing their Aryan supremacy on them. And such is the remaining status quo in the world today.” [Tellinger, M., 2006, Slave Species of God, page 116]

In the twelfth century B.C., Enlil’s sons, Ninurta and Adad (known here as Ashur or Ishkur) sent their Assyrians, under Tiglat-Pileser I north and west, into Lebanon all the way to the Mediteranean.

In the ninth century B.C., the Assyrian king Shalmaneser III, sent by Adad and Nergal with advanced artillery defeated Marduk’s Babylonians. Then, in 689 B C., the Assyrian king Sennacherib sacked Babylon because Marduk” became angry with Babylon’s king and people” and sentenced them to seventy years of Assyrian domination. Sennacherib used “rocketlike missiles” supplied by Adad.  Sennacherib subjugated Phoenicia, Gaza and Judea but was repulsed at Jerusalem by Enlil/Yahweh, who, at night with a techno-weapon, killed 185,000 Assyrian soldiers. Yahweh had Sennacherib murdered and replaced by Esarhaddon,  Sennachrib’s son, whom Enlil had Inanna accompany. Inanna proclaimed to the soldiers and people of Assyria that Esarhaddon was now Assyria’s king.

Inanna used “an intense, blinding brilliance” on her headgear to blind Enemies of Esarhaddon’s successor, Ashurbanipal in Arabia and an attack on Marduk’s Egyptian forces, [Sitchin, Z. 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men pages 12-19]

By this time in Earth’s history, the power known as “Yahweh” in the Bible refers to the being who created the Nibirans and overpowered the Nibiran astronauts and their hybrid armies on Earth. In parts of the Bible, its authors merge several astronauts with the creator-god, Yahweh. The Bible’s “Yahweh” is (in ancient literature) a composite of Enlil, Enlil’s father Anu, Enlil’s brother Enki, Enlil’s sons Ninurta and Adad/Teshub, Enlil’s nephew Marduk as well as Yahweh, the Nibiran creator-god. [Sitchin, Z., 1995, Divine Encounters, pages 347 -380]. Yahweh may even be a power like the mysterious Galzu, an apparent interdimensional.

Our other half, the Homo Erectus in us–the hominid the Nibirans altered–resonates with Gaia, this planet. Homo Erectus was probably a species devolved from earlier Homo Sapiens Sapiens settlement of our planet, millions of years before the arrival of the Nibirans.

Our Gaia aspect cooperates more than our Nibiran aspect. When we know and balance both within us, we break the godspell, become peers rather than servants of the gods. We and they evolve together to support, encouragement, love and celebration of consciousness and its manifestations.

****

References

Bramley, W.
1989, The Gods of Eden
Cremo, M. and Thompson, R.
1993, Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race
Cremo, M.
__2003, Human Devolution: A Vedic Alternative to Darwin’s Theory
Freer, N.
__ 1999, God Games
__ 2000, Breaking the Godspell
Hazelton, L.
__ 2007, Jezebel
Hoagland, R. & Bara, M.,
2007, Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA

Kramer, S,
1971, The Sumerians

Marrs, J.
1998, Alien Agenda
2000, Rule By Secrecy (Part V, Ancient Mysteries)

Sitchin, Z.
_1976, The 12th Planet
_1983, The Stairway to Heaven
_1985, The Wars of Gods and Men
_1990, Genesis Revisited
_1990, The Lost Realms
_1993, When Time Began
_1995, Divine Encounters
_2002, The Lost Book of Enki
_2004, The Earth Chronicles Expeditions
_2007, The End of Days
_2007, Journeys to the Mythical Past____

Strauss, B.,
_2006, The Trojan War

Tellinger, M.
__ 2006, Slave Species of god_

Thompson, R.
1993, Alien Identities

***
***
More on the Gods of Old: Anunnaki: Gods No More by Sasha Lessin, Ph.D. (Anthropology, U.C.L.A.)

http://enkispeaks.com/books/anunnaki-gods-no-more/

<a href=”http://enkispeaks.com/books/anunnaki-gods-no-more/”>http://enkispeaks.com/books/anunnaki-gods-no-more/</a>

http://vimeo.com/user7362624/sasha-lessin-phd

RETURN TO WOODSTOCK NATION: Web Radio Tribute to JONI MITCHELL

joni-mitchell-8989898

Listen to internet radio with Aquarian Radio on Blog Talk Radio

Viewing Ang Lee’s “Taking Woodstock,” we recalled that Joni Mitchell, who’s not in the film, wrote the Woodstock song. Even though she dropped out from making that festival scene in upstate New York in 1969. Why? Her manager insisted she appear on the Dick Cavett Show. All the same, Joni immortalized the event with her lyrics, as did singers Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young, who scored a hit on Billboard’s Hot 100 with the Woodstock single from their album, Deja Vu. “By the time we got to Woodstock,” go the lyrics, “we were half a million strong, and everywhere there was song and celebration …”

“She captured the feeling and importance of the Woodstock festival better than anyone who’d been there,” reflected David Crosby. Joni wrote the song in a Manhattan hotel room, while watching the events unfold on her television. Not being there, she claimed, gave her an intense perspective on what was happening during the landmark folk-rock concert of “peace and victory.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2009/08/29/secrets-woodstock-truth-joni-mitchell/#ixzz2OiixcKhq

 

Joni Mitchell

Joni Mitchell With Mountain DulcimerUploaded on Dec 18, 2007
http://www.coloradream.com/art.html ~ A look back at a time that brought people together with music, celebration and love! Sure there was lots of sex, drugs and rock & roll…but the true nature of this event was a coming together as one…to experience life to its fullest…a moment in time that will live on forever in our hearts and minds.

I came upon a child of god
He was walking along the road
And I asked him, where are you going
And this he told me
I’m going on down to Yasgur’s farm
I’m going to join in a rock n roll band
I’m going to camp out on the land
I’m going to try an get my soul free
We are stardust
We are golden
And we’ve got to get ourselves
Back to the garden

1246472498-joni-mitchellThen can I walk beside you
I have come here to lose the smog
And I feel to be a cog in something turning
Well maybe it is just the time of year
Or maybe its the time of man
I don’t know who l am
But you know life is for learning
We are stardust
We are golden
And we’ve got to get ourselves
Back to the garden

By the time we got to Woodstock
We were half a million strong
And everywhere there was song and celebration
And I dreamed I saw the bombers
Riding shotgun in the sky
And they were turning into butterflies
Above our nation
We are stardust
Billion year old carbon
We are golden
Caught in the devils bargain
And we’ve got to get ourselves
Back to the garden

CSNY-1144-images

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young

 

 

 

 

 

 

Woodstock” is a song about the Woodstock Music and Art Festival of 1969.

graham20nash2

 

Joni Mitchell wrote the song from what she had heard from then-boyfriend, Graham Nash, about the festival. She had not been there herself, since she was told by a manager that it would be more advantageous for her to appear on The Dick Cavett Show. She wrote this song in a hotel room in New York City, watching televised reports of the festival. “The deprivation of not being able to go provided me with an intense angle on Woodstock,” she told an interviewer shortly after the event.[1] It was later released on her third album, Ladies of the Canyon in 1970, on her Shadows and Light album, and again in 1996 on her Hits album.

Mitchell’s original version featured a stark and haunting arrangement – solo vocal, multi-tracked backing vocals and tremoloed Wurlitzer electric piano, all performed by Mitchell herself. All subsequent recordings featured a fuller backing band sound.
Prior to release on any album, Mitchell performed “Woodstock” at the 1969 Big Sur Folk Festival, one month after Woodstock. The solo performance can be seen in the festival concert film Celebration at Big Sur (released in 1971). The performance was an exception to Mitchell’s mounting distaste for large festival gigs. [2]

The song later went on to be hits for Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young and Matthews Southern Comfort, the latter reaching #1 on the UK singles chart for three weeks in October 1970, and the former reaching #11 on the Billboard Hot 100. The Assembled Multitude’s 1970 instrumental version reached #79 in the US. David Crosby, in an interview in the documentary Joni Mitchell: Woman of Heart and Mind, said that Mitchell had captured the feeling and importance of the Woodstock festival better than anyone who had been there.[3]

Led Zeppelin incorporated Woodstock’s lyrics and structure into live renditions of Jake Holmes’ song “Dazed and Confused” between 1973 and 1975. It can be heard on the currently unreleased “Dazed and Confused” section of the video from one of the 1975 Earl’s Court concerts.
A version was performed by Richard Thompson at the 2000 All-Star Tribute To Joni Mitchell, later broadcast on TNT

A 40th anniversary version of “Woodstock” was released in 2009 by Nick Vernier Band featuring Iain Matthews (formerly of Matthews Southern Comfort).
The band America recorded a version of this song for their 2011 album Back Pages.
James Taylor did a cover on the May 22, 1997 broadcast of The Howard Stern Show.
The band Austra recorded a version of the song for the Deluxe edition of their album “Feel it Break”.

Brooke Fraser recorded and released a version of the song in her 2010 album “Flags”
[edit]In popular culture

In Carl Sagan’s series Cosmos, Sagan refers to us as “Star Stuff”.
A line from the chorus, “We are billion year old carbon,” was used by Corey Mesler as the title of a novel about the 1960s.[4]
The song was also used in an episode of Beverly Hills, 90210 where the characters act out the story of a girl from the 1960s whose diary is found by Brenda.
The song was used in a Six Feet Under episode entitled “Back to the Garden” (named after a lyric in the song) in 2002, but the song isn’t featured on the official soundtrack.
Astronautalis references the song in “Dimitri Mendeleev,” when he sings: “Joni Mitchell said ‘we are stardust, / we are golden’, we are all the same.”[5]

Southern Comfort version

Joni Mitchell wrote the song from what she had heard from then-boyfriend, Graham Nash, about the festival. She had not been there herself, since she had instead chosen to appear on The Tonight Show. She wrote this song crying at home watching the show on television.

The song later went on to be hits for Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young and Matthews’ Southern Comfort, the latter reaching #1 on the UK singles chart for three weeks in October 1970. David Crosby in an interview said that Mitchell had captured the feeling and importance of the Woodstock festival better than anyone who had been there.

Led Zeppelin incorporated Woodstock’s lyrics and structure into live renditions of their song “Dazed and Confused” between 1973 and 1975.

 

Bobby Darin’s gift of peace: A Simple Song of Freedom TELL THE PEOPLE EVERYWHERE WE THE PEOPLE HERE DON’T WANT NO WAR

Bobby Darin Last Shows

Listen to internet radio with Aquarian Radio on Blog Talk Radio

SIMPLE SONG OF FREEDOM LYRICS – BOBBY DARIN

Come and sing a simple song of freedom
Sing it like you’ve never sung before
Let it fill the air
Tell the people everywhere
We, the people here, don’t want a war

Hey there, Mister Black Man can you hear me?
I don’t want your diamonds or your game
I just want to be, someone known to you as me
and I will bet my life you want the same
Come and sing a simple song of freedom
Sing it like you’ve never sung before
Let it fill the air
Tell the people everywhere
We, the people here, don’t want a war

Seven hundred million are you listening?
Most of what you read is made of lies
But speaking one to one, ain’t it everybody’s sun
To wake to in the morning when we rise?

So come and sing a simple song of freedom
Sing it like you’ve never sung before
Let it fill the air
Tell the people everywhere
We, the people here, don’t want a war

Brother Solzhenitsyn are you busy?
If not would you drop a friend a line?
Tell me if the man, who is plowing up your land
has got the war machine upon his mind

Come and sing a simple song of freedom
Sing it like you’ve never sung before
Let it fill the air
Tell the people everywhere
That we, the people here, don’t want a war

Now no doubt some folks enjoy doin’ battle
Like presidents, prime ministers and kings
So let’s build them shelves where they can fight among themselves
and leave the people be who like to sing

Come and sing a simple song of freedom
Sing it like you’ve never sung before
Let it fill the air
Tell the people everywhere
That we the people here, don’t want a war

Let it fill the air
Tell the people everywhere
That we the people here, don’t want a war

Freedom!
Freedom!
Freedom!

Children sing for peace. Shot in Kabul, Afghanistan and Palm Springs, CA – this moving anti-war ballad is a reminder that the pleas of children are universal – They do not want war. Lyrics by Bobby Darin and David Rothmiller. Arrangement by Andres Condon. More info: trickdogfilms.com

Uploader Comments (jmarkz53)

jmarkz53 7 months ago
AWESOME! I knew somebody would know where this came from. This video was aired during a P.B.S. ‘Folk Rewind’ special. They probably have the DVD available. It was typycal 60’s stuff until this segment came on and took me totaly off guard. Thanks again!
Reply · 7

Milind Kaduskar 10 months ago
When was this video shot? Is this the performance that Kevin Spacey used in Beyond The Sea as the finale?
Reply · 3

jmarkz53 9 months ago
It wouldn’t surprise me if this performance WAS THE INSPIRATION(?) for Kevin Spacey’s performance (and kudo’s to Mr. Spacey for doing his own singing!) I’ve not been able to track down any info concerning this particular performance, so if anybody else can help, JUMP IN!
Reply · 4 in reply to Milind Kaduskar
Top Comments

paulslefthand 1 year ago
I’m 17 and last year I just happened to stumble upon Bobby Darin. I really wish popular music was still like this!! It sure beats dubstep and crap like that! :)
Reply · 44
All Comments (79)

click to leave a comment

Jay Branson 15 hours ago
Great song! it was like he was trying to hold himself back. He seems to have been filled with such emotions.
Reply ·

andrewquigley18 2 weeks ago
good song the way it should be industrial war fucks
Reply ·

stone wall 2 weeks ago
bobby it is great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply ·

McMillian5 2 weeks ago
As acclaimed as he was in his life, Bobby Darin is probably the most underrated performer ever.
Reply ·

Carole Robinson 4 weeks ago
Bobby was influenced by Bobby Kennedy…
Reply ·

onemanband1950 1 month ago
I am.62 yrs. old now,(2013), and have sung Bobby Darin’s song of freedom for most of my life, almost as a comforting mantra. The song is so incredibly beautiful and with such meaning and always gave warmth to my heart. To honour Bobby , I love singing and playing it on my acoustic guitar for people. God bless Mr. Darrin, and I thank him so much for this touching song. Wish so much that he could have lived longer. His song here sure did give me life.